--On Wednesday, February 23, 2011 6:49 PM +0100 Mark Martinec
wrote:
> Quanah,
>
>> wrote:
>> > Now in the 2.7.0, in addition to the above, it became possible to
>> > call SpamAssassin more than once per message. See description
>> > of settings @sa_userconf_maps and @sa_username_maps
>> > in t
Quanah,
> wrote:
> > Now in the 2.7.0, in addition to the above, it became possible to
> > call SpamAssassin more than once per message. See description
> > of settings @sa_userconf_maps and @sa_username_maps
> > in the recent RELEASE_NOTES. Recipients of a message may
> > specify individual SA u
--On Wednesday, February 23, 2011 3:50 PM +0100 Mark Martinec
wrote:
> Now in the 2.7.0, in addition to the above, it became possible to
> call SpamAssassin more than once per message. See description
> of settings @sa_userconf_maps and @sa_username_maps
> in the recent RELEASE_NOTES. Recipients
> > I've a question about user preferences.
> > What if a mail has multiple addressees?
>
> Each recipient is treated individually, according to their preferences.
>
> > If they use different settings is it possible
> > that some of them receives a potential spam while others do not?
>
> Yes.
[.
Gabor,
> I've a question about user preferences.
> What if a mail has multiple addressees?
Each recipient is treated individually, according to their preferences.
> If they use different settings is it possible
> that some of them receives a potential spam while others do not?
Yes.
> How taggi
Hi folks,
I've a question about user preferences.
What if a mail has multiple addressees?
If they use different settings is it possible
that some of them receives a potential spam while others do not?
How tagging does work in this case? Each recipients
get a different header with its own scores?
