Re: [AMaViS-user] UNCHECKED vs BypassVirusChecks

2009-04-11 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Tue, April 7, 2009 19:20, Mark Martinec wrote: However, if users HAVE asked for Virus checking, and Amavisd is unable to check the attachment, then it SHOULD modify the Subject to UNCHECKED. Your suggestion makes sense, I'll make the change with 2.6.3, thanks! how does mailzu see this if

Re: [AMaViS-user] UNCHECKED vs BypassVirusChecks

2009-04-07 Thread Mark Martinec
Jorgen, We are experiencing the issue that when users have amavisBypassVirusCheck set to TRUE, mails containing password-protected zips, or zips that trigger the expantionQuota, will modify the Subject to ***UNCHECKED***. Since the user has asked for no virus checking, it should not modify

Re: [AMaViS-user] UNCHECKED vs BypassVirusChecks

2009-03-30 Thread Jorgen Lundman
Don't know if it is correct, but I stuck this code in +8815: if ($hold ne '' || $any_undecipherable) { # Before Amavis would change the Subject for everyone # but we added code to check LDAP for each recip, and only change # Subject: if VIRUS scanning is wanted.

[AMaViS-user] UNCHECKED vs BypassVirusChecks

2009-03-23 Thread Jorgen Lundman
Current version: 2.5.3, LDAP, Posfix on Solaris 10. We are experiencing the issue that when users have amavisBypassVirusCheck set to TRUE, mails containing password-protected zips, or zips that trigger the expantionQuota, will modify the Subject to ***UNCHECKED***. Since the user has asked for