Ashish,
> What I am asking is how had amavis reached on the conclusion that for a
> spam score of '6.9', amavis should start spam evasive action. What is
> the reasoning behind the spam score assumptions.
Andy Dills writes:
> Bottom line? The values they provide for default are very conservative,
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> On 6/1/10 8:18 AM, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
> > Michael,
> >
> > The comments against spam score only tell what will happen if a given email
> > reaches a given spam score level.
> >
> > What I am asking is how had amavis reached on the conclusion that
On 6/1/10 8:18 AM, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
> Michael,
>
> The comments against spam score only tell what will happen if a given email
> reaches a given spam score level.
>
> What I am asking is how had amavis reached on the conclusion that for a spam
> score of '6.9', amavis should start spam evasi
d the spam score assumptions.
Thanks
Ashish Sharma
-Original Message-
From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:scheid...@secnap.net]
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 5:36 PM
To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] about amavis spamassassin spam scores
On 5/31/10 6:35 AM, Shar
On 5/31/10 6:35 AM, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have setup a mail receiving postfix server.
>
> On this I have setup amavisd(with ClamAV and Spamassassin) using
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd
>
> Here my setup would be catering to emails received from all over the world
> (includin
Hi,
I have setup a mail receiving postfix server.
On this I have setup amavisd(with ClamAV and Spamassassin) using
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd
Here my setup would be catering to emails received from all over the world
(including mails from China, Japan etc),
Now in amavisd.conf ther
