[AMaViS-user] Bayes autolearn not working?

2006-12-07 Thread Jef Driesen
In the amavis headers, I don't see autolearn = ham|spam|no. Even for very high spam levels. Does this means autolearning is not enabled? My spamassassin /etc/spamassassin/local.cf (from ubuntu) says bayes_auto_learn is enabled by default. Bayes itself is working, because I have hits for the

Re: [AMaViS-user] Bypass amavisd scanning

2006-12-07 Thread David Obando
Hi, I would like to allow spam-bypassing in the following cases: -mail is generated on the server itself, i.e. bypassing for specified IPs Generated on the system itself, but submitted to Postfix how? Via 'pickup' or smtp? To be honest, I don't know. My regarding master.cf lines

Re: [AMaViS-user] LDAP lookups for mydomains

2006-12-07 Thread Mark Martinec
Dave, Is possible to put $mydomains in an LDAP lookup ? Not sure what you mean by that. What you place in LDAP is up to you, amavisd does not place anything in LDAP. If the question is how to match on some domains besides those that are in your LDAP, you may use static lookup tables for

Re: [AMaViS-user] sendmail, XFORWARD and policy_banks

2006-12-07 Thread Mark Martinec
Claude, I think, a very simple solution would be do include a special X-Header in the message coming from the receiving sendmail instance, in which one the IP address of the client would be included. sendmail can easily be configured in order to do this. Because this receiving sendmail

Re: [AMaViS-user] FP on p0f

2006-12-07 Thread Mark Martinec
Michael, I understand the suggested high value for windows XP, (since a workstation isn't a mail server) But the original suggested pattern matches, match this one as windows XP (and score it high!) when it could just as well be a windows 2000 sp3 server: X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Windows

Re: [AMaViS-user] Bypass amavisd scanning

2006-12-07 Thread Gary V
David wrote: Hi, I would like to allow spam-bypassing in the following cases: -mail is generated on the server itself, i.e. bypassing for specified IPs Generated on the system itself, but submitted to Postfix how? Via 'pickup' or smtp? To be honest, I don't know. My regarding master.cf

Re: [AMaViS-user] Bypass amavisd scanning

2006-12-07 Thread David Obando
Gary V schrieb am 07.12.2006 15:39: Your mail log will tell you. Simply observe if pickup is used for this mail. Thanks, I now found ways to handle it. Regards, David -- The day microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is the day they start making vacuum cleaners. gpg --keyserver

Re: [AMaViS-user] LDAP lookups for mydomains

2006-12-07 Thread Dave Augustus
What I want to do is store mydomains in LDAP? Is that possible? If so, can I specify the location to search? Thanks, Dave On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 14:07 +0100, Mark Martinec wrote: Dave, Is possible to put $mydomains in an LDAP lookup ? Not sure what you mean by that. What you place in

[AMaViS-user] load bunnies

2006-12-07 Thread Matt Herzog
What is a good way to put a heavy load on an amavis machine? How to simulate a heavy spam assault? -- Announcing your plans is a good way to hear the gods' laughter. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT

[AMaViS-user] @bypass_spam_checks_acl not working?

2006-12-07 Thread Melissa
I am attempting to bypass spam scanning for outgoing mail using @bypass_spam_checks_acl According to the docs: # don't run spam check for these RECIPIENT domains: # @bypass_spam_checks_acl = qw( d1.com .d2.com a.d3.com ); # or the other way around (bypass check for all BUT these): #

Re: [AMaViS-user] load bunnies

2006-12-07 Thread Clifton Royston
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 03:46:22PM -0500, Matt Herzog wrote: What is a good way to put a heavy load on an amavis machine? How to simulate a heavy spam assault? It's not too hard. You can pretty easily cook something up with formail (part of the procmail tool suite), a folderful of spam, and

Re: [AMaViS-user] @bypass_spam_checks_acl not working?

2006-12-07 Thread Gary V
Melissa wrote: I am attempting to bypass spam scanning for outgoing mail using @bypass_spam_checks_acl According to the docs: # don't run spam check for these RECIPIENT domains: # @bypass_spam_checks_acl = qw( d1.com .d2.com a.d3.com ); # or the other way around (bypass check for all

[AMaViS-user] amavisd with spamc/spamd for load balancing

2006-12-07 Thread Trey Nolen
We are currently using qmail-scanner for virus scanning and spam tagging. We process over 1.5 million messages per day and are starting to run into performance issues with qmail-scanner. We are looking at amavisd-new as a replacement, but we have an issue with the spam implementation. Right