Re: [AMaViS-user] To Warn Or not To Warn?

2006-11-16 Thread Lucio Chiappetti
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Noel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] My opinion is no, don't do this. Spam and viruses commonly have forged sender addresses, so your offsite warning will often just annoy some innocent third party, I fully agree. I still have some procmail rules

Re: [AMaViS-user] To Warn Or not To Warn?

2006-11-16 Thread Mark Martinec
Lucio Chiappetti wrote: I've never really understood the fuss about banned files and bad header, at the end we decided to let them pass (we get about 2 bad header per day over 2000 spamham, and no banned files) silently. The primary reason for banned files checks is to be able to catch new

Re: [AMaViS-user] To Warn Or not To Warn?

2006-11-15 Thread Mark Martinec
Andres, Well, I have this on my 50-user file config $warn_offsite = 1; Is this a good practice ? Or should I shut this down to lower the load on the MTA? (the load of sending warn emails to outside) The extra load is minimal, but the annoyance to recipients is non-negligible. On