Would it make sense to move the virus checks to another machine ?
Gmax
Trey,
I am not opposed to multiple amavisd-new servers, but I'm not sure how
that would be implemented with our setup. The messages are all
delivered to one server, so how do you propose that we distribute the
email
Trey,
I am not opposed to multiple amavisd-new servers, but I'm not sure how
that would be implemented with our setup. The messages are all
delivered to one server, so how do you propose that we distribute the
email among multiple servers? We cannot just do it on a per-domain
basis,
Trey Nolen wrote:
We are currently using qmail-scanner for virus scanning and spam
tagging. We process over 1.5 million messages per day and are
starting to run into performance issues with qmail-scanner. We are
looking at amavisd-new as a replacement, but we have an issue with the
spam
On 12/8/06, Stuart Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trey Nolen wrote:
We are currently using qmail-scanner for virus scanning and spam
tagging. We process over 1.5 million messages per day and are
starting to run into performance issues with qmail-scanner. We are
looking at
Trey Nolen wrote:
On 12/8/06, Stuart Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trey Nolen wrote:
We are currently using qmail-scanner for virus scanning and spam
tagging. We process over 1.5 million messages per day and are
starting to run into performance issues with qmail-scanner. We are
I am not opposed to multiple amavisd-new servers, but I'm not sure how
that would be implemented with our setup. The messages are all
delivered to one server, so how do you propose that we distribute the
email among multiple servers? We cannot just do it on a per-domain
basis, because some
We are currently using qmail-scanner for virus scanning and spam
tagging. We process over 1.5 million messages per day and are
starting to run into performance issues with qmail-scanner. We are
looking at amavisd-new as a replacement, but we have an issue with the
spam implementation. Right
