* Danilo Godec:
> I recently started using the 'clamav-unofficial-sigs' script
> (https://github.com/extremeshok/clamav-unofficial-sigs/)
Unsurprisingly, I recommend https://github.com/rseichter/fangfrisch
instead, because it is more secure, robust and easier to configure.
-Ralph
* sse:
> Is there a way to put From: email address instead of return path in
> the subject line?
What you call "return path" is the envelope sender address. In any case,
see README.customize in the Amavis GitLab repository.
-Ralph
* Jan Engels:
> Thanks for the hint with the wrapper script. Unfortunately I'm not
> very familiar with the internals of how amavisd processes the output
> from the unpack tools. This is for me currently too time intensive to
> debug :(
The good thing about open source software is that you can
* Jan Engels:
> The amavis version running in our system is:
> amavisd-new-2.11.1-1.el7.noarch
> clamav-0.102.2-4.el7.x86_64
Amavis 2.12.0 was released eight months ago, so updating should be the
first step. If the unrar problem still exists with the current Amavis
version, I suggest you file a
* supp...@mmarzouki.de:
> at the same time, amavisd sent the virus mailnotification to the
> virus-admin. but this is the wrong behavior because the mail is only
> encrypted and is not a virus.
This is the expected behaviour. Amavis is unable to examine the file
content, so an UNCHECKED
* supp...@mmarzouki.de:
> tools like unrar or cabextract is not available in centos8 with
> epel-release and enabled PowerTools.
Amavis searches the system it is running on for some well-known
binaries. If CentOS uses different ones, you can manually change the
list of binaries by modifying your
* supp...@mmarzouki.de:
> I want to hide my used tools for security reasons.
What "security" is that, specifically? As I already wrote, access to the
quarantined messages (which contain the headers you want to hide) is
restricted. What benefit would an attempt to hide the fact that you are
using
* supp...@mmarzouki.de:
> $allowed_added_header_fields{lc('Received')} = 0;
Interesting. I'm not sure if this is supposed to affect quarantined
messages or not.
> i wish this to hide my used tools.
Well, quarantined messages end up in some holding area on your server,
be it a file in a
* korsar:
> Weird, but read_hash(\%whitelist_sender, '/etc/amavisd/whitelist');
> @whitelist_sender_maps = (\%whitelist_sender); make it for recipients,
> not senders...
Please show proof (e.g. logs), not your interpretation. Besides, that's
not the correct syntax for Amavis::Util::read_hash.
* korsar:
> I mean 7zip supports 35 archive type, any of them may be used to hide
> ransomware in the .rar or .zip file and opened by end user. So the
> mail system is only half protected.
Amavis' default settings are not meant to offer complete protection,
just a reasonable basis to start from.
* korsar:
> 1) ACE has no support at all, need to add it
Not having seen ACE archives in the wild for more than 10 years, I don't
think so. Besides, to my knowledge ACE is a proprietary format with a
Windows focus and a license that does not permit including it in free
software.
> 2) gzip -
The Gentoo ebuild for amavis 2.12.0 was committed two hours ago. It adds
two new USE flags 'rspamd' and 'rspamd-https' which will take care of
new Perl dependencies if you want to use the Rspamd extension.
As usual for updated ebuilds, it is considered unstable, so you need to
use
* Jānis:
> What this AV-scan-2 represents?
What "the second virus scanner" represents depends on the contents of
@av_scanners in your amavisd.conf and on the installed virus scanners.
-Ralph
* Dorian ROSSE:
> Dominic too doesn’t bring good repair…
>
> I go to workout nobody can help me correctly here,
Several people here have told you what to do. If you're still having
difficulties, consider hiring somebody to fix things for you, but please
don't complain about help given free of
* Alexander Wirt:
> $myhostname = 'bitfenix-server';
Hmmm. Should that not be
$myhostname = "bitfenix-server.$mydomain";
instead? I thought that $myhostname is expected to be a FQDN?
-Ralph
* Olivier:
> Il y a un message d'erreur clair pourtant:
Please use English in the future (as required for most mailing lists).
> Starting amavisd: Number found
> where operator expected at /etc/amavis/conf.d/50-user line 13, near "1"
Looks like Ubuntu has opted for a non-standard split
I have spent quite some time looking for a decent Perl IDE (and I mean
IDE, not just an editor) with debugging capabilities. Alas, my search
was not fruitful. Years back, I had a go with EPIC [1], but it is
incompatible with current Eclipse releases. Then there's Padre [2], or
at least there was
* Henrik K.:
> If I revert these removed lines to 2.11.1, it seems to work
That's a known issue, and an open merge request already exists:
https://gitlab.com/amavis/amavis/merge_requests/1
-Ralph
On 19.10.18 07:52, Dominic Raferd wrote:
> you need to define @mynetworks *inside* the policy bank for it to
> be effective for these emails - in your case this means inside
> $policy_bank { 'AM.PDP-SOCK' }.
The following works for me with amavisd-new 2.10.1
$inet_socket_bind = ['127.0.0.1',
On 11.10.18 15:02, Curtis Maurand wrote:
> And DKIM signing, please. 1024 bit keys don't seem to work
Looking at your message, I see a failed verification for maurand.com,
but the DKIM signature for amavis.org is reported as being OK:
Authentication-Results: ra.horus-it.com;
dkim=pass
On 10.10.18 19:17, Danny Horne wrote:
> With the large gap between versions, are the various Linux repos still
> being updated? (interested in Fedora myself)
I assume that Fedora has a package maintainer mailing list and/or an
issue tracker, and that you'll probably have a better shot at getting
On 10.10.18 07:41, Imre Rad wrote:
> Is this the bug you're talking about? [...]
See https://gitlab.com/amavis/amavis/issues/6 and the Gentoo bug report
I linked there.
-Ralph
On 10.10.18 11:57, Mark Rousell wrote:
> I am having problems signing up to the devel list via the web
> interface.
I experienced the same issue. My attempt to submit a confirmation cookie
using Safari caused an expected warning for submitting via a cleartext
connection, and then the same page
On 09.10.18 19:46, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Greetings all the patient attendees of this ML and users of Amavis
Ah, the man himself. ;-) Thank you for reacting to my inquiry. I can
understand that priorities can shift, and I want to personally thank
you for all the work you put into amavisd-new
On 08.10.18 09:21, Tom Sommer wrote:
> [OpenDKIM] is a perfectly fine solution, since it's not really an
> Amavis-job to handle DKIM.
And who gave you the mandate to decide what is and what is not "an
Amavis-job"? ;-) See https://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/#features --
amavisd-new is designed
On 08.10.18 01:09, Dave McGuire wrote:
> are there any bugs in amavisd-new that anyone cares about at this
> point?
Yes, DKIM-related, see my original message. From what I can tell the
available patch does not fix everything. Because of this issue I have
disabled amavisd-new's DKIM-features
On 07.10.18 23:35, Dave McGuire wrote:
> Personally I rather like it when a piece of infrastructure software
> stops being a "moving target".
I like to know if software currently used in production systems is
maintained, i.e. how likely it is that bugs will be fixed in a
reasonable amount of
On 07.10.18 12:12, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> That's too a one man show?
See https://github.com/rspamd/rspamd/blob/master/AUTHORS.md
-Ralph
On 07.10.18 12:23, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> Not really merge them or even do a new release (which is a fork
> needing manpower and coordination to avoid fragmentation), but as a
> central point for known defects and patches floating around on the
> mailing list.
Would that not only give a false
On 07.10.18 00:26, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> I think that if Mark Martinek is not maintaining any more the
> community should step up and fork the project.
Are you volunteering? I've made some local modifications over time, but
amavisd-new with its >35000 lines of monolithic Perl is not something
Hello list members.
Does anybody here know if Mark Martinec (or anybody else) is actively
maintaining amavisd-new? https://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/ has last
been updated more than two years ago, with the 2.11.0 release. The link
to the "Freshmeat project page" [1] points to information which
On 24.11.17 17:16, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> I was testing this with 2.11.0 - went back to 2.10.1 and the expected
> behaviour was restored ( mail from !MYNETS is not being DKIM signed).
>
> So what has changed?
I'd like to know that as well. I have blocked amavisd versions >= 2.11.0
because I
On 17.09.16 15:02, Dino wrote:
> Test
Looking at your message's time stamp, it arrived at my server three days
after it has been sent to the amavis users mailing list. Something is not
working as expected with that list.
-Ralph
On 15.09.2016 05:11, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
> I want to know if amavisd-new can bock mails based on Message-ID:,
> when it has a particular PATTERN?
If by "block" you mean "reject before the message is received", I think
you're looking in the wrong place.
Like many others, I use a
This is a repost because there has not been any reply since the original
mail one week ago. Please help me with this. Thanks!
Hello list members,
I am having some troubles configuring an av_scanners entry to use the
BitDefender bdconsole tool to scan for viruses with amavisd-new 2.7.2.
First,
Hello list members,
I am having some troubles configuring an av_scanners entry to use the
BitDefender bdconsole tool to scan for viruses with amavisd-new 2.7.2.
First, I wonder if I am the only one having trouble finding documentation
about av_scanners n-tuple entries? I searched, looked at the
36 matches
Mail list logo
