Re: X-Google-DKIM-Signature gets not DKIM verified by amavis

On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 20:04 +0100, Mark Schweizer wrote: X-Google-DKIM-Signature: header? google breaking standards, yet again, by the looks of it. Otherwise they might use that for internal use? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: cronjob warning perl_version (SOLVED)

On 30/11/2014 22:42, Alexander Wirt wrote: On Sun, 30 Nov 2014, A. Schulze wrote: Benny Pedersen: Upgrade to sa 3.4 where this work, else wait for next rule update, this is a work in progress thats only gives error when not using sa 3.4 At least here I *have* 3.4 but got the same

Re: testing ...

On 09/09/2015 05:42, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: * Benny Pedersen : Patrick Ben Koetter skrev den 2015-09-08 20:45: >Authentication-Results: mail.sys4.de (amavisd-new); dkim=pass >(1024-bit key) >header.d=amavis.org header.b=SBMRAVBH; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) >

Re: break dkim signed mail

On 10/09/2015 21:54, Benny Pedersen wrote: Noel Butler skrev den 2015-09-10 00:18: Authentication-Results: mail.ausics.net (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amavis.org header.b=X7zvfneB; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=zimbra.com header.b=T3e0NNFd Authentication

RE: The amavisd daemon is apparently not running, no PID file (OSX 10.11.x)

On 11/02/2016 21:17, Roland Schmid wrote: Try increase $log_level = 0; to 5 and see maillog I'd check permissions, and try running from root account amavisd runs with user _amavisd amavis daemon was disabled in

Re: Amavis 2.10.1 dies and is unusable when put under moderate load

8:19 AM +1000 Noel Butler <noel.but...@ausics.net> wrote: you might want to CC Marc directly - he hasn't posted in here in a very log time, inn fact Oct 2014 is last time I think when he announced that version, strange, since he posts regularly on postfix list we know he's still

Re: Amavis 2.10.1 dies and is unusable when put under moderate load

you might want to CC Marc directly - he hasn't posted in here in a very log time, inn fact Oct 2014 is last time I think when he announced that version, strange, since he posts regularly on postfix list we know he's still alive and kickin. On 26/01/2016 04:48, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:

Re: Amavis 2.10.1 dies and is unusable when put under moderate load

Yes, I agree, github would be perfect On 26/01/2016 08:56, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 8:50 AM +1000 Noel Butler <noel.but...@ausics.net> wrote: Yeah, a lot of people here have seem to have no luck, I think I mentioned twice about a problem with no

Re: The amavisd daemon is apparently not running, no PID file (OSX 10.11.x)

On 10/02/2016 21:43, Roland Schmid wrote: Hallo, der Amavis Daemon läuft nicht auf unserem OSX-Server. sudo /Applications/Server.app/Contents/ServerRoot/usr/bin/amavisd start endet mit diesem Fehler: The amavisd daemon is apparently not running, no PID file

Re: Amavisd fails to start. Missing UNIX::Syslog??

What is "dnf" ? What OS/flavor? What was updated today? What does maillog show when trying to start amavisd? Multiple versions of perl? Try running amavisd binary 'strace -f -o/tmp/ amavisd start ' then review /tmp/ and see if it gives more clues. On 15/03/2016 19:40, Stephen

Re: ANNOUNCE: amavisd-new-2.11.0-rc1 release candidate is available

Hi Mark, " - remove a stale database file __db.nanny.db on a reload or restart, as it can prevent a successful start when a previous start failed for some reason; a patch by Trent Lloyd; " Does this patch fix the constant logfile-filling logging of no db found, by just creating the damn

RE: ANNOUNCE: amavisd-new-2.11.0 released

On 29/04/2016 20:00, Benedict White wrote: A release 2.11.0 of amavisd-new now is available at: https://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-... Release notes are at: [...] (!!)TROUBLE in child_init_hook: BDB can't connect db env. at /var/amavis/db: No such file or directory, No such file

Re: ANNOUNCE: amavisd-new-2.11.0 released

On 27/04/2016 05:46, Mark Martinec wrote: A release 2.11.0 of amavisd-new now is available at: https://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-... Release notes are at: [...] (!!)TROUBLE in child_init_hook: BDB can't connect db env. at /var/amavis/db: No such file or directory, No such file

Re: handling unknown recipients

On 29/04/2016 18:24, Tilman Schmidt wrote: On 28.04.2016 03:42, @lbutlr wrote: Is there a way to validate the recipient address before bothering with the content of the mail? Yes, have postfix check for valid users first before passing the message to amavis. That is indeed my

RE: ANNOUNCE: amavisd-new-2.11.0 released

On 29/04/2016 20:48, Benedict White wrote: Benedict may not be a dev but who's to say that he hasn't solved this exact issue himself and is holding the secret that you desire? I've been running Amavis for years, including re installing it several times. I have seen similar errors. They

Re: reject mail when SPF test is incorrect for specific domain

On 30/04/2016 01:40, Frédéric Goudal wrote: Hello, I have searched for some time and have not found a solution for the following problem : - we do have a correct spf record for our domain - I would like to reject mail pretending to come from our domain Is there any way to do that with amavis

Re: reject mail when SPF test is incorrect for specific domain

On 04/05/2016 09:30, Patrick Domack wrote: Quoting Noel Butler <noel.but...@ausics.net>: On 03/05/2016 18:02, Frédéric Goudal wrote: Le 30 avr. 2016 à 04:02, Noel Butler <noel.but...@ausics.net> a écrit : On 30/04/2016 01:40, Frédéric Goudal wrote: Hello, I have searched f

Re: ANNOUNCE: amavisd-new-2.11.0 released

On 01/05/2016 22:09, Phil Regnauld wrote: So, you've: - used amavisd-new for years - you've identified the problem (I assume you've sent patches to fix the issue) And, years later, you are still complaining about the issue, you haven't remedied the problem in

Re: ANNOUNCE: amavisd-new-2.11.0 released

On 02/05/2016 16:58, Christian Rößner wrote: Am 02.05.2016 um 04:43 schrieb Noel Butler <noel.but...@ausics.net>: Dear mister smartfuck Please unsubscribe this user from this mailing list. Thanks Christian — Christian Rößner B.Sc. Erlenwiese 14, 36304 Alsfeld T: +49 6631 78823400,

Re: List issues?

On 16/09/2016 19:38, Dino Edwards wrote: Did something change in the mailing list? I'm not getting my replies or my posts back. I can see they are showing up in the archives but the mailing list is not redistributing back to me. I hope this is not related to some ridiculous mailman config about

Re: List issues?

On 15/09/2016 19:05, @lbutlr wrote: I sent a message to the list yesterday (15:59 -0600) and it has not shown up, nor have I gotten any sort of notification that it was not posted or was rejected for some reason. From: "@lbutlr" Message-Id:

Re: get a copy of rejected message

AND to send a copy of > it to a dedicated address? > > That would be like quarantine to an email address but with reject status to > the smtp client. Not sure on this part if you run it via a milter, I'd assume not though unless you modified the milter code -- Kind Regards, Noel Butle

EOL F-prot

Hi all, Be aware got this notice, confirmed, that f-prot is EOL as of July 31 this year, there will be no more updated definitions, no more nothing. Time to start looking at suitable alternatives folks. -- Regards, Noel Butler This Email, including attachments, may contain legally

Re: Amavis and OpenDMARC

been updated in years is not necessarily a sign of " time to find something else "... I've seen no problems with mail from MS, so how about you elaborate on your problems and what version of OD are you using? -- Regards, Noel Butler This Email, including attachments, may conta

Re: Amavis and OpenDMARC

ail for private use so if ill-configured mailing lists for example rejected them, then that's acceptable collateral damage. -- Regards, Noel Butler This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to copyri

Re: Virus checking options

m ], in debian, you must add clamav to amavis group, so clamd is able to read mails unpacked by amavis. perhaps redhat-based systems have similar requirement. Perhaps, might explain it too. I haven't touched a rpm (or deb) system in a very long time (we use slackware) so can't check myself

Re: Virus checking options

On 26/04/2023 16:55, Damian wrote: Fedora 38 ships Amavis 2.13.0 which switched to clamdscan in Amavis upstream. We have a winner... Did the package manager explain/release_note why they made that move? -- Regards, Noel Butler This Email, including attachments, may contain legally

Re: Virus checking options

On 26/04/2023 09:53, Benny Pedersen wrote: clamdscan why ?, load of all signatures pr email scanned is slow very slow :) clamscan is slow clamdscan is the client for clamd and is fast, that would be why he is using it. -- Regards, Noel Butler This Email, including attachments, may

Re: Amavis and OpenDMARC

On 21/11/2023 20:08, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 21.11.23 12:06, Noel Butler wrote: This also depends on how you set DKIM's canonicalization this is a (known) problem of DKIM and playing with DMARC will not solve it. Anyone using simple/simple should have a DKIM fail and plenty use

Re: Amavis and OpenDMARC

ompany and not those of lists (this is a lists-only email & not "personal" addy)/forums/irc/nor usenet for next four weeks unless that damn cyclone interferes with my plans :) Happy Holidays -- Regards, Noel Butler

Re: Amavis and OpenDMARC

On 28/11/2023 19:45, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 21.11.23 12:06, Noel Butler wrote: But they are inter-twined, DMARC just does what DKIM and SPF declare, so any perceived DMARC issues *do* include DKIM and SPF but this is irelevant here. We will have to agree to disagree Not "a

Re: Amavis and OpenDMARC

On 15/11/2023 13:59, Dave McGuire wrote: On 11/14/23 22:03, Noel Butler wrote: I would understand if those reports were required for DKIM fail or SPF fail, but missing aligned SPF pass is something common with mailing lists. You only get them on failures not every message, and no, not all

Re: Amavis and OpenDMARC

, Noel Butler This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate this message without the authors express written authority to do so

Re: Amavis and OpenDMARC

On 12/11/2023 13:03, Nick Tait wrote: On 12/11/23 15:10, Noel Butler wrote: DMARC (thus OpenDMARC) makes its decision based on the senders DMARC fo policy - if policy uses fo=0 then yes, both SPF and DKIM must exist, and both must pass. if policy uses fo=1 then no, as a minimum

Re: Amavis and OpenDMARC

On 12/11/2023 14:04, Noel Butler wrote: My understanding of the "fo" option is that it is only used for reporting. i.e. It doesn't control whether the received email is accepted or not, which is always based on _either_ SPF or DKIM checks passing. From RFC 7489: fo: Failure

Re: Amavis and OpenDMARC

DKIM. Then set fo=d :) -- Regards, Noel Butler This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate this message without the authors expre

Re: Amavis and OpenDMARC

MS guys I know on there, or if no response there used to be a MS guy on the mailop list, no idea if he's still there, that list is run by self important power tripping dictators so it should be a last resort port of call if your desperate, if it was google I could help much deeper :) -- Regards, N

Re: Amavis and OpenDMARC

are you seeing for them? You also dont need to setup amavisd as a milter if its working fine already. -- Regards, Noel Butler This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to copyright protected under

Re: Amavis and OpenDMARC

On 11/11/2023 18:07, Damian wrote: Also, since they allude to "some passing", I guess they did remember to set enable_dkim_verification=1 ? "Some passing OpenDMARC" might mean that they pass SPF-based only. true if using fo=1 -- Regards, Noel Butler This Email, includ

Re: Amavis and OpenDMARC

opendmarc just the inet:127.0.0.1:54321 is needed, thats all you need, are you sure it is adding sigs on sending? send an email to check-a...@verifier.port25.com wait a minute then check its results email. -- Regards, Noel Butler This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged

Re: Amavis and OpenDMARC

link can't connect ;) -- Regards, Noel Butler This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate this message without the authors expre

Re: DBD::MySQL upstream change

On 30/03/2024 11:42, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: Is is safe to replace DBD::MySQL with DBD::MariaDB ? I am.using it in production on Alma Linux 9. also on... slackware 15.0 slackware -current -- Regards, Noel Butler

Re: DBD::MySQL upstream change

different. We are doing just that here with no other changes, zero issues on dozens of administrative scripts that use it (including users/host management). -- Regards, Noel Butler

Re: DBD::MySQL upstream change

fic and so DBD::MariaDB cannot provide them. It has to use "mariadb_*" prefix. So if application uses driver specific mysql_* options they have to be renamed. ... -- Regards, Noel Butler

Re: Mails in quarantine, send to user.

Hi, Your post might be best in English, but if my translation is correct in that you are asking for a way to release quarantines files, yes, see amavis-release, if you can not find it in your distro package (I dont use debian so no idea if they do install it for you) , it's in the source package.