Also an interesting case:
var yield = 5;
var res = switch(yield) { default -> yield + yield; } // are we
returning result of binary plus (10) or yielding result of unary plus
(5)? Seems the first one, yet confusing.
Tagir.
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 4:30 AM Dan Smith wrote:
>
> > On May 22, 2019,
On 5/23/2019 2:29 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
2) Type names: 'yield' might be used as the name of a class, type of
a method parameter, type of a field, array component type, type of a
'final' local variable etc. Or we can prohibit it entirely as a type
name.
We went through this when designing 'var', a
On May 23, 2019, at 2:29 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
>
> Are people generally good with my preferred restrictions, or do you think
> it's better to be more permissive?
In this case I prefer the restrictions because, again,
it's a simpler user experience. The loss of the method
name "yield" for an *un
> On May 22, 2019, at 9:45 AM, Brian Goetz wrote:
>
> The “compromise” strategy is like the smart strategy, except that it trades
> fixed lookahead for missing a few more method invocation cases. Here, we
> look at the tokens that follow the identifier yield, and use those to
> determine whet
