Reader mail bag

A number of comments have come in on the -comments list.  If you want to continue the discussion on any of these, please start a new thread. Regarding the brief thread on do expressions: Hi All, I have seen your discussion regarding using a new expression to place field's initialization block

Reader mail bag

This was received on the amber-spec-comments list. > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Daniel Latrémolière > Subject: Record design (and ancillary fields) > Date: April 13, 2018 at 11:43:40 PM EDT > To: amber-spec-comme...@openjdk.java.net > > Isn't it

Re: Named parameters [was: Re: Reader mail bag]

e otherwise. cheers, Rémi - Mail original - De: "Brian Goetz" <brian.go...@oracle.com> À: "amber-spec-experts" <amber-spec-experts@openjdk.java.net> Envoyé: Jeudi 30 Novembre 2017 19:29:41 Objet: Reader mail bag We've gotten two submissions to the amber-sp

Re: Reader mail bag

rridden methods make thing far simpler that they are otherwise. cheers, Rémi - Mail original - > De: "Brian Goetz" <brian.go...@oracle.com> > À: "amber-spec-experts" <amber-spec-experts@openjdk.java.net> > Envoyé: Jeudi 30 Novembre 2017 19:2

Re: Reader mail bag

> On Nov 30, 2017, at 1:29 PM, Brian Goetz wrote: > . . . > So, while named parameters are a reasonable feature to explore, trying to > staple them onto data classes would be a mistake. They are their own > feature. We're open to exploring it, but we've got our plate