On 01/06/17 11:27 PM, Li, Samuel wrote:
>> If amdgpu.ids living in the amdgpu directory prevents it from being used by
>> libdrm_radeon (why?), let's put it in a new toplevel directory, e.g.
>> "data".
>>> README is also located in this directory.
>> Not the same thing. It documents things about
[+cc ADMGPU, DRM folks]
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 06:49:07PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> From: Christian König
>
> Try to resize BAR0 to let CPU access all of VRAM.
>
> v2: rebased, style cleanups, disable mem decode before resize,
> handle gmc_v9 as well, round
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 4:27 AM, Florian Echtler wrote:
> On 31.05.2017 14:57, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:48:37AM +0200, Florian Echtler wrote:
>>>
>>> Hm, try booting with
Please ignore what I wrote. Looks like I was a bit hasty in my
judgement. The code just doesn't read easily but seems correct, other
than the array size.
Harry
On 2017-05-31 04:17 PM, Harry Wentland wrote:
On 2017-05-31 09:32 AM, Harry Wentland wrote:
On 2017-05-31 05:37 AM, Daniel Vetter
>If amdgpu.ids living in the amdgpu directory prevents it from being used by
>libdrm_radeon (why?), let's put it in a new toplevel directory, e.g.
>"data".
>> README is also located in this directory.
> Not the same thing. It documents things about the header files, and doesn't
> get installed
> -Original Message-
> From: Huang Rui [mailto:ray.hu...@amd.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 7:18 AM
> To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Deucher, Alexander; Koenig, Christian
> Cc: Wang, Ken; Huan, Alvin; Huang, Ray
> Subject: [PATCH v2 00/21] S3 following up
>
> Hi all,
>
>
When you git email-send first time, there is a message-id, when you
would send follow up patches, using --in-reply-to="message-id" in your
comment line, then that will be in the same thread.
Cheers,
Leo
On 06/01/2017 09:40 AM, Xie, AlexBin wrote:
Ok. I will add the v2 next time. I did
Ok. I will add the v2 next time. I did not add the v2 in case this email list
does not put the two patches under same thread...
-Alex Bin
From: Christian König
Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 9:26 AM
To: Xie, AlexBin;
Am 01.06.2017 um 01:08 schrieb Alex Xie:
In review, Christian would like to keep the logic
inside amdgpu_vm.c with a cost of slightly slower.
The loop is still optimized out with this patch.
v2: remove the if statement. Now it is not slower.
Signed-off-by: Alex Xie
Hi Christian,
Please review this v2 patch. It is slightly faster.
Thanks,
Alex Bin
From: Xie, AlexBin
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 7:08 PM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Xie, AlexBin
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Move compute vm bug logic to
On 06/01/2017 06:55 AM, Christian König wrote:
Am 31.05.2017 um 21:28 schrieb Leo Liu:
To simplify vce bo create
Signed-off-by: Leo Liu
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c | 27
+++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff
On 31.05.2017 14:57, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:48:37AM +0200, Florian Echtler wrote:
>>
>> Hm, try booting with drm.debug=0xf to see if link training for the
>> eDP connector succeeds. If the link
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
index
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Ken Wang wrote:
> Change-Id: If7dee7bd1074eac7faa6af724a7272f9ce6f3a98
> Signed-off-by: Ken Wang
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 3 ---
> 1
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 12:15 AM, zhoucm1 wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年05月31日 23:52, Harry Wentland wrote:
>>
>> DCN bw calcs currently rely on the following gcc options:
>>-mhard-float -msse -mpreferred-stack-boundary=4
>>
>> We probably shouldn't really try building this on
Patch #18 is Reviewed-by: Christian König .
The rest of the set is Acked-by: Christian König .
Regards,
Christian.
Am 01.06.2017 um 13:17 schrieb Huang Rui:
Hi all,
Changes from V1 -> V2:
- Rename pt_regs to gart_pt_regs,
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfxhub_v1_0.c | 34
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mmhub_v1_0.c | 34
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
index a901f73..3325104 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mmhub_v1_0.c | 173 +++-
1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mmhub_v1_0.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mmhub_v1_0.c
index
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfxhub_v1_0.c | 141 ++-
1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfxhub_v1_0.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfxhub_v1_0.c
index
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v6_0.c | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v7_0.c | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c | 2 ++
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfxhub_v1_0.c | 37 +---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mmhub_v1_0.c | 36 +--
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git
Hi all,
Changes from V1 -> V2:
- Rename pt_regs to gart_pt_regs, dis_identity_aperture to
disable_identity_aperture.
- Use upper_32_bits/lower_32_bits macros.
- Add comments and fix "uint64_t" for stolen size.
- Merge page table regs function into page table aperture.
- Add three patches to use
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 11:06:41AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> This interface allows importing the fence from a sync_file into
> an existing drm sync object, or exporting the fence attached to
> an existing drm sync object into a new sync file object.
>
Am 31.05.2017 um 20:46 schrieb Andres Rodriguez:
On 2017-05-31 02:53 AM, Christian König wrote:
2. How are the priorities from processes supposed to interact with
the per context priority?
Do you mean process niceness?
There isn't any relationship between niceness and gpu priority.
Let
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 11:06:39AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> Sync objects are new toplevel drm object, that contain a
> pointer to a fence. This fence can be updated via command
> submission ioctls via drivers.
>
> There is also a generic wait obj API
On 2017年06月01日 16:50, Christian König wrote:
Am 01.06.2017 um 06:15 schrieb zhoucm1:
On 2017年05月31日 23:52, Harry Wentland wrote:
DCN bw calcs currently rely on the following gcc options:
-mhard-float -msse -mpreferred-stack-boundary=4
We probably shouldn't really try building this on
Am 01.06.2017 um 06:15 schrieb zhoucm1:
On 2017年05月31日 23:52, Harry Wentland wrote:
DCN bw calcs currently rely on the following gcc options:
-mhard-float -msse -mpreferred-stack-boundary=4
We probably shouldn't really try building this on architectures
other than x86.
Does it mean our
Am 31.05.2017 um 20:09 schrieb Alex Xie:
In review, Christian would like to keep the logic
inside amdgpu_vm.c with a cost of slightly slower.
The loop is still optimized out with this patch.
Signed-off-by: Alex Xie
Reviewed-by: Christian König
On 01/06/17 12:32 AM, Li, Samuel wrote:
>> From: Michel Dänzer [mailto:mic...@daenzer.net]
>> On 31/05/17 07:31 AM, Li, Samuel wrote:
>>> From: Michel Dänzer [mailto:mic...@daenzer.net]
On 30/05/17 06:16 AM, Samuel Li wrote:
> diff --git a/amdgpu/amdgpu_asic_id.c
30 matches
Mail list logo