On Fri, 2024-04-05 at 09:30 -0700, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review, and for the appetite to go further! So we are
> on the same page, you would prefer
> renaming to controller/target like the feedback on other drm drivers
> (i915, gma500, radeon)?
FWIW I'm in support of this as
On 05/04/2024 18:39, Joshi, Mukul wrote:
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
-Original Message-
From: Sharma, Shashank
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 11:37 AM
To: Joshi, Mukul ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Koenig, Christian ; Deucher, Alexander
; Yadav, Arvind
Subject: Re: [PATCH]
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
> -Original Message-
> From: Sharma, Shashank
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 11:37 AM
> To: Joshi, Mukul ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Koenig, Christian ; Deucher, Alexander
> ; Yadav, Arvind
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix MES HQD masks
>
Hi Easwar,
On 3/29/24 18:00, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of
I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface,
On 01/04/2024 12:07, Paneer Selvam, Arunpravin wrote:
Hi Matthew,
On 3/28/2024 10:18 PM, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 28/03/2024 16:07, Paneer Selvam, Arunpravin wrote:
Hi Matthew,
On 3/26/2024 11:39 PM, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 18/03/2024 21:40, Arunpravin Paneer Selvam wrote:
- Add tracking
On 05/04/2024 17:26, Joshi, Mukul wrote:
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
-Original Message-
From: amd-gfx On Behalf Of
Shashank Sharma
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 10:36 AM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Sharma, Shashank ; Koenig, Christian
; Deucher, Alexander
; Yadav,
tree/branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
branch HEAD: 8568bb2ccc278f344e6ac44af6ed010a90aa88dc Add linux-next specific
files for 20240405
Error/Warning reports:
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404051333.7und7ppw-...@intel.com
https
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
> -Original Message-
> From: amd-gfx On Behalf Of
> Shashank Sharma
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 10:36 AM
> To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Sharma, Shashank ; Koenig, Christian
> ; Deucher, Alexander
> ; Yadav, Arvind
> Subject: [PATCH]
This patch fixes the existing HQD masks prepared during the MES
initialization. These existing masks values were causing problems
when we try to enable GFX oversubscription.
Cc: Christian König
Cc: Alex Deucher
Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma
Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav
---
When we removed the hacky start code check we actually didn't took into
account that *all* VRAM pages needs to be CPU accessible.
Clean up the code and unify the handling into a single helper which
checks if the whole resource is CPU accessible.
The only place where a partial check would make
On 4/2/2024 2:00 AM, Martin Habets wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:00:34PM +, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
>> series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix
On 4/2/2024 1:29 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:00:34PM +, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
>> series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the
On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 17:32:46 -0400
Leo Li wrote:
> On 2024-03-28 10:33, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 13:09:56 -0400
> > wrote:
> >
> >> From: Leo Li
> >>
> >> These patches aim to make the amdgpgu KMS driver play nicer with
> >> compositors
> >> when building multi-plane
13 matches
Mail list logo
