On Fri, 1 Sept 2023 at 21:00, Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 6:01 PM Alex Hung wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2023-08-30 01:29, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > On Tue, 29 Aug 2023, Alex Hung wrote:
> > >> On 2023-08-29 11:03, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > >>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023, Jani Nikula
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023, Alex Hung wrote:
> On 2023-08-30 01:29, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023, Alex Hung wrote:
>>> There is a patch under internal reviews. It removes calls edid_override
>>> and drm_edid_override_connector_update as intended in this patchset but
>>> does not remove the
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 6:01 PM Alex Hung wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2023-08-30 01:29, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Aug 2023, Alex Hung wrote:
> >> On 2023-08-29 11:03, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Tue,
On 2023-08-30 01:29, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023, Alex Hung wrote:
On 2023-08-29 11:03, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 6:48 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2023, Jani Nikula
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 10:29:46AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Upstream code should be reviewed in public.
Yup
-Sima
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023, Alex Hung wrote:
> On 2023-08-29 11:03, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 6:48 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2023, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Tue, 22
On 2023-08-29 11:03, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 6:48 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2023, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 22 Aug 2023, Alex Hung wrote:
On 2023-08-22 06:01, Jani Nikula
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 6:48 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 23 Aug 2023, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> > On Tue, 22 Aug 2023, Alex Hung wrote:
>>> >> On 2023-08-22 06:01, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> >>> Over the
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 6:48 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 23 Aug 2023, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> > On Tue, 22 Aug 2023, Alex Hung wrote:
>> >> On 2023-08-22 06:01, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> >>> Over the past years I've been trying to unify the override
; Siqueira, Rodrigo ;
Wheeler, Daniel ; Wu, Hersen ;
Chien, WenChieh (Jay) ; Deucher, Alexander
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm/amd/display: stop using
drm_edid_override_connector_update()
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 6:48 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2023, Jani Nikula
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 6:48 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2023, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Aug 2023, Alex Hung wrote:
> >> On 2023-08-22 06:01, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >>> Over the past years I've been trying to unify the override and firmware
> >>> EDID handling as well as EDID
, Rodrigo ;
Wheeler, Daniel ; Wu, Hersen ;
Daniel Vetter ; Chien, WenChieh (Jay)
; Deucher, Alexander ;
Wentland, Harry
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm/amd/display: stop using
drm_edid_override_connector_update()
On Wed, 23 Aug 2023, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2023, Alex H
On Wed, 23 Aug 2023, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2023, Alex Hung wrote:
>> On 2023-08-22 06:01, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> Over the past years I've been trying to unify the override and firmware
>>> EDID handling as well as EDID property updates. It won't work if drivers
>>> do their own
13 matches
Mail list logo