[PATCH] dma-fence: basic lockdep annotations

2020-06-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
Design is similar to the lockdep annotations for workers, but with some twists: - We use a read-lock for the execution/worker/completion side, so that this explicit annotation can be more liberally sprinkled around. With read locks lockdep isn't going to complain if the read-side isn't

Re: [PATCH] dma-fence: basic lockdep annotations

2020-06-11 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 05-06-2020 om 15:29 schreef Daniel Vetter: > Design is similar to the lockdep annotations for workers, but with > some twists: > > - We use a read-lock for the execution/worker/completion side, so that > this explicit annotation can be more liberally sprinkled around. > With read locks

Re: [PATCH] dma-fence: basic lockdep annotations

2020-06-05 Thread Intel
On 6/5/20 3:29 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: Design is similar to the lockdep annotations for workers, but with some twists: - We use a read-lock for the execution/worker/completion side, so that this explicit annotation can be more liberally sprinkled around. With read locks lockdep isn't

[PATCH] dma-fence: basic lockdep annotations

2020-06-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
Design is similar to the lockdep annotations for workers, but with some twists: - We use a read-lock for the execution/worker/completion side, so that this explicit annotation can be more liberally sprinkled around. With read locks lockdep isn't going to complain if the read-side isn't