On 4/23/2018 9:53 AM, S, Shirish wrote:
On 4/20/2018 11:52 PM, Harry Wentland wrote:
On 2018-04-17 10:56 PM, Shirish S wrote:
Currently the dm_dp_aux_transfer() does not parse
the return value of dal_ddc_service_read_dpcd_data(), which also
has a failure case.
This patch captures the same a
On 4/20/2018 11:52 PM, Harry Wentland wrote:
On 2018-04-17 10:56 PM, Shirish S wrote:
Currently the dm_dp_aux_transfer() does not parse
the return value of dal_ddc_service_read_dpcd_data(), which also
has a failure case.
This patch captures the same and ensures the i2c operation status is
sent
On 2018-04-17 10:56 PM, Shirish S wrote:
> Currently the dm_dp_aux_transfer() does not parse
> the return value of dal_ddc_service_read_dpcd_data(), which also
> has a failure case.
> This patch captures the same and ensures the i2c operation status is
> sent appropriately to the drm framework.
>
Currently the dm_dp_aux_transfer() does not parse
the return value of dal_ddc_service_read_dpcd_data(), which also
has a failure case.
This patch captures the same and ensures the i2c operation status is
sent appropriately to the drm framework.
V2: Updated commit message.
Signed-off-by: Shirish S