On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 12:37:15PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> I2C_CLASS_SPD was used to expose the EEPROM content to user space,
> via the legacy eeprom driver. Now that this driver has been removed,
> we can remove I2C_CLASS_SPD support. at24 driver with explicit
> instantiation should be use
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 6:37 AM Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>
> I2C_CLASS_SPD was used to expose the EEPROM content to user space,
> via the legacy eeprom driver. Now that this driver has been removed,
> we can remove I2C_CLASS_SPD support. at24 driver with explicit
> instantiation should be used inste
On 13.11.2023 12:37, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> I2C_CLASS_SPD was used to expose the EEPROM content to user space,
> via the legacy eeprom driver. Now that this driver has been removed,
> we can remove I2C_CLASS_SPD support. at24 driver with explicit
> instantiation should be used instead.
>
> If in
I2C_CLASS_SPD was used to expose the EEPROM content to user space,
via the legacy eeprom driver. Now that this driver has been removed,
we can remove I2C_CLASS_SPD support. at24 driver with explicit
instantiation should be used instead.
If in doubt this patch could be applied via the i2c tree.
Si