Was this patch ever picked up? I can't find it in agd5f/linux.
>>>
>>>
>>> It wasn't applied. I don't see 51f7415039d4 ("drm/amd/amdgpu:
>>> creating two I2S instances for stoney/cz") upstream yet either.
>>> Daniel, Vijendar, which ones do you want applied? Can you send me the
>>>
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 4:48 AM, Mukunda,Vijendar
wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday 03 July 2018 09:50 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 5:48 PM, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Alex,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 9:48 PM Agrawal, Akshu
>>> wrote:
On 4/13/2018
On Tuesday 03 July 2018 09:50 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 5:48 PM, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 9:48 PM Agrawal, Akshu wrote:
On 4/13/2018 9:45 PM, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
Commit 51f7415039d4 ("drm/amd/amdgpu: creating two I2S instances for
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 5:48 PM, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 9:48 PM Agrawal, Akshu wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/13/2018 9:45 PM, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>> > Commit 51f7415039d4 ("drm/amd/amdgpu: creating two I2S instances for
>> > stoney/cz") added support for the "BT_I2S"
Hi Alex,
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 9:48 PM Agrawal, Akshu wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/13/2018 9:45 PM, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > Commit 51f7415039d4 ("drm/amd/amdgpu: creating two I2S instances for
> > stoney/cz") added support for the "BT_I2S" ACP i2s channel. As part of
> > this change, one additional
On 4/13/2018 9:45 PM, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
Commit 51f7415039d4 ("drm/amd/amdgpu: creating two I2S instances for
stoney/cz") added support for the "BT_I2S" ACP i2s channel. As part of
this change, one additional acp resource was added, but the "num_resource"
count was accidentally incremented
Commit 51f7415039d4 ("drm/amd/amdgpu: creating two I2S instances for
stoney/cz") added support for the "BT_I2S" ACP i2s channel. As part of
this change, one additional acp resource was added, but the "num_resource"
count was accidentally incremented by 2.
This incorrect count eventually causes
