On 2018-08-24 03:09 PM, Christian König wrote:
> Am 24.08.2018 um 20:59 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
>> On 2018-08-24 03:32 AM, Christian König wrote:
>>> The roundup to a power of two here is not 100% correct, but I don't
>>> think it will hurt us much.
>>>
>>> For now the patch is Reviewed-by: Christi
Am 24.08.2018 um 20:59 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
On 2018-08-24 03:32 AM, Christian König wrote:
The roundup to a power of two here is not 100% correct, but I don't
think it will hurt us much.
For now the patch is Reviewed-by: Christian König
.
Thanks. Do you mind elaborating on what's not 100% c
On 2018-08-24 03:32 AM, Christian König wrote:
> The roundup to a power of two here is not 100% correct, but I don't
> think it will hurt us much.
>
> For now the patch is Reviewed-by: Christian König
> .
Thanks. Do you mind elaborating on what's not 100% correct here?
Maybe do the min(..., max_s
Am 24.08.2018 um 00:37 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
Set the VM size based on system memory size between the ASIC-specific
limits given by min_vm_size and max_bits. GFXv9 GPUs will keep their
default VM size of 256TB (48 bit). Only older GPUs will adjust VM size
depending on system memory size.
This m
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 06:37:10PM -0400, Felix Kuehling wrote:
> Set the VM size based on system memory size between the ASIC-specific
> limits given by min_vm_size and max_bits. GFXv9 GPUs will keep their
> default VM size of 256TB (48 bit). Only older GPUs will adjust VM size
> depending on syst
On 08/24/2018 06:37 AM, Felix Kuehling wrote:
Set the VM size based on system memory size between the ASIC-specific
limits given by min_vm_size and max_bits. GFXv9 GPUs will keep their
default VM size of 256TB (48 bit). Only older GPUs will adjust VM size
depending on system memory size.
This ma
Set the VM size based on system memory size between the ASIC-specific
limits given by min_vm_size and max_bits. GFXv9 GPUs will keep their
default VM size of 256TB (48 bit). Only older GPUs will adjust VM size
depending on system memory size.
This makes more VM space available for ROCm application
Am 22.08.2018 um 19:40 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
On 2018-08-22 02:55 AM, Christian König wrote:
Am 21.08.2018 um 23:45 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
[snip]
+ } else {
+ struct sysinfo si;
+ unsigned int phys_ram_gb;
+
+ /* Optimal VM size depends on the amount of physical
+
On 2018-08-22 02:55 AM, Christian König wrote:
> Am 21.08.2018 um 23:45 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
[snip]
>> + } else {
>>> + struct sysinfo si;
>>> + unsigned int phys_ram_gb;
>>> +
>>> + /* Optimal VM size depends on the amount of physical
>>> + * RAM available. Under
Am 21.08.2018 um 23:45 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
This patch is meant for amd-staging-drm-next. It's part of my effort to
reduce differences between kfd-staging and upstream and eventually
replace all our memory manager hacks with upstream solutions.
This commit should only affect GFXv8 and older.
On 08/22/2018 05:25 AM, Felix Kuehling wrote:
Set the VM size based on system memory size between the ASIC-specific
limits given by min_vm_size and max_bits. GFXv9 GPUs will keep their
default VM size of 256TB (48 bit). Only older GPUs will adjust VM size
depending on system memory size.
This ma
This patch is meant for amd-staging-drm-next. It's part of my effort to
reduce differences between kfd-staging and upstream and eventually
replace all our memory manager hacks with upstream solutions.
This commit should only affect GFXv8 and older. It should not have any
negative impact, except bi
Set the VM size based on system memory size between the ASIC-specific
limits given by min_vm_size and max_bits. GFXv9 GPUs will keep their
default VM size of 256TB (48 bit). Only older GPUs will adjust VM size
depending on system memory size.
This makes more VM space available for ROCm application
13 matches
Mail list logo
