, 2021 10:07 PM
To: Chen, Guchun ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Zhang, Hawking ; Li, Candice ;
Lazar, Lijo
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: added synchronization for psp cmd buf access
Hello Guchun,
In most of those cases you are right it is redundant, the reason i kept them
separate f
ailto:candice...@amd.com>>; Lazar, Lijo
mailto:lijo.la...@amd.com>>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: added synchronization for psp cmd buf access
Hello Guchun,
In most of those cases you are right it is redundant, the reason i kept them
separate for now is to resolve this bug while also ke
: RE: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: added synchronization for psp cmd buf access
[Public]
@Chen, Guchun<mailto:guchun.c...@amd.com>,
Based off your feedback I double checked the code, and I changed my opinion
about it, I think it's better just to reuse the original mutex for now. I've
submitted an u
: Zhang, Hawking ; Li, Candice ;
Lazar, Lijo
Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: added synchronization for psp cmd buf access
[Public]
Before calling into psp_cmd_submit_buf, a mutex psp->cmd_buf_mutex is there,
and after entering psp_cmd_submit_buf, there is another mutex psp->mutex, is it
op.org
Cc: Zhang, Hawking ; Li, Candice ;
Lazar, Lijo ; Chen, Guchun
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: added synchronization for psp cmd buf access
[AMD Official Use Only]
Submitting patch to synchronize access to psp cmd submission memory to resolve
potential race conditions.
[AMD Official Use Only]
Submitting patch to synchronize access to psp cmd submission memory to resolve
potential race conditions.
0001-drm-amdgpu-added-synchronization-for-psp-cmd-buf-acc.patch
Description: 0001-drm-amdgpu-added-synchronization-for-psp-cmd-buf-acc.patch
