On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:32:56AM -0400, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
>
> On 5/11/20 5:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 02:51:44PM -0400, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
> > > This RFC is a more of a proof of concept then a fully working solution as
> > > there are a few unresolved
On 5/11/20 5:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 02:51:44PM -0400, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
This RFC is a more of a proof of concept then a fully working solution as there
are a few unresolved issues we are hopping to get advise on from people on the
mailing list.
Until now
On 5/11/20 5:26 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2020 14:51:44 -0400
Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
This RFC is a more of a proof of concept then a fully working
solution as there are a few unresolved issues we are hopping to get
advise on from people on the mailing list. Until now
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:08 PM Lukas Wunner wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 02:21:57PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:43 PM Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:54:33AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > - One unfortunate thing with drm_dev_unplug
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 02:21:57PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:43 PM Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:54:33AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > - One unfortunate thing with drm_dev_unplug is that the driver core is
> > > very opinionated and doesn't
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 2:34 PM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 11.05.20 um 13:19 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:54:33AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 02:51:44PM -0400, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
> >>> This RFC is a more of a proof of concept then a
Am 11.05.20 um 13:19 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:54:33AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 02:51:44PM -0400, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
This RFC is a more of a proof of concept then a fully working solution as there
are a few unresolved issues we are
Am 11.05.20 um 11:26 schrieb Pekka Paalanen:
On Sat, 9 May 2020 14:51:44 -0400
Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
This RFC is a more of a proof of concept then a fully working
solution as there are a few unresolved issues we are hopping to get
advise on from people on the mailing list. Until now
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:43 PM Lukas Wunner wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:54:33AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > - One unfortunate thing with drm_dev_unplug is that the driver core is
> > very opinionated and doesn't tell you whether it's a hotunplug or a
> > driver unload. In the
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:54:33AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> - One unfortunate thing with drm_dev_unplug is that the driver core is
> very opinionated and doesn't tell you whether it's a hotunplug or a
> driver unload. In the former case trying to shut down hw just wastes
> time (and
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:54:33AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 02:51:44PM -0400, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
> > This RFC is a more of a proof of concept then a fully working solution as
> > there are a few unresolved issues we are hopping to get advise on from
> > people
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:19:30AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Vetter (2020-05-11 10:54:33)
> > - worse, neither vk nor gl (to my knowledge) have a concept of events
> > for when the gpu died. The only stuff you have is things like
> > arb_robustness which says a)
Quoting Daniel Vetter (2020-05-11 10:54:33)
> - worse, neither vk nor gl (to my knowledge) have a concept of events
> for when the gpu died. The only stuff you have is things like
> arb_robustness which says a) everything continues as if nothing
> happened b) there's a function where
On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 02:51:44PM -0400, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
> This RFC is a more of a proof of concept then a fully working solution as
> there are a few unresolved issues we are hopping to get advise on from people
> on the mailing list.
> Until now extracting a card either by physical
On Sat, 9 May 2020 14:51:44 -0400
Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
> This RFC is a more of a proof of concept then a fully working
> solution as there are a few unresolved issues we are hopping to get
> advise on from people on the mailing list. Until now extracting a
> card either by physical
This RFC is a more of a proof of concept then a fully working solution as there
are a few unresolved issues we are hopping to get advise on from people on the
mailing list.
Until now extracting a card either by physical extraction (e.g. eGPU with
thunderbold connection or by emulation through
16 matches
Mail list logo
