From: Xiangliang Yu <xiangliang...@amd.com>

In order to not break SRIOV gfx development, will revert
this patch after vce proved working.

Signed-off-by: Xiangliang Yu <xiangliang...@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Monk Liu <monk....@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c
index f9e45d2..eccd70a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c
@@ -957,6 +957,10 @@ int amdgpu_vce_ring_test_ring(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
        unsigned i;
        int r;
 
+       /* TODO: remove it if VCE can work for sriov */
+       if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev))
+               return 0;
+
        r = amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 16);
        if (r) {
                DRM_ERROR("amdgpu: vce failed to lock ring %d (%d).\n",
@@ -995,6 +999,10 @@ int amdgpu_vce_ring_test_ib(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, long 
timeout)
        struct fence *fence = NULL;
        long r;
 
+       /* TODO: remove it if VCE can work for sriov */
+       if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(ring->adev))
+               return 0;
+
        /* skip vce ring1/2 ib test for now, since it's not reliable */
        if (ring != &ring->adev->vce.ring[0])
                return 0;
-- 
2.5.5

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to