On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:10:00PM +0800, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> Am 10.09.2018 um 15:05 schrieb Tom St Denis:
> > On 2018-09-10 9:04 a.m., Christian König wrote:
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>
> >> I'm talking about adding new printks to figure out what the heck is
> >> going wrong here.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
Am 10.09.2018 um 15:05 schrieb Tom St Denis:
On 2018-09-10 9:04 a.m., Christian König wrote:
Hi Tom,
I'm talking about adding new printks to figure out what the heck is
going wrong here.
Thanks,
Christian.
Hi Christian,
Sure, if you want to send me a simple patch that adds more printk I'l
On 2018-09-10 9:04 a.m., Christian König wrote:
Hi Tom,
I'm talking about adding new printks to figure out what the heck is
going wrong here.
Thanks,
Christian.
Hi Christian,
Sure, if you want to send me a simple patch that adds more printk I'll
gladly give it a try (doubly so since my wo
Hi Tom,
I'm talking about adding new printks to figure out what the heck is
going wrong here.
Thanks,
Christian.
Am 10.09.2018 um 14:59 schrieb Tom St Denis:
Hi Christian,
Are you adding new traces or turning on existing ones? Would you like
me to try them out in my setup?
Tom
On 2018-
Hi Christian,
Are you adding new traces or turning on existing ones? Would you like
me to try them out in my setup?
Tom
On 2018-09-10 8:49 a.m., Christian König wrote:
Am 10.09.2018 um 14:05 schrieb Huang Rui:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 05:25:48PM +0800, Koenig, Christian wrote:
Am 10.09.201
Am 10.09.2018 um 14:05 schrieb Huang Rui:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 05:25:48PM +0800, Koenig, Christian wrote:
Am 10.09.2018 um 11:23 schrieb Huang Rui:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 11:00:04AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Hi Ray,
well those patches doesn't make sense, the pointer is only local to
t
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 05:25:48PM +0800, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> Am 10.09.2018 um 11:23 schrieb Huang Rui:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 11:00:04AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> >> Hi Ray,
> >>
> >> well those patches doesn't make sense, the pointer is only local to
> >> the function.
> > You'r
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 05:25:48PM +0800, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> Am 10.09.2018 um 11:23 schrieb Huang Rui:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 11:00:04AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> >> Hi Ray,
> >>
> >> well those patches doesn't make sense, the pointer is only local to
> >> the function.
> > You'r
Am 10.09.2018 um 11:23 schrieb Huang Rui:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 11:00:04AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Hi Ray,
well those patches doesn't make sense, the pointer is only local to
the function.
You're right.
I narrowed it with gdb dump from ttm_bo_bulk_move_lru_tail+0x2b, the
use-after-free
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 11:00:04AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Hi Ray,
>
> well those patches doesn't make sense, the pointer is only local to
> the function.
You're right.
I narrowed it with gdb dump from ttm_bo_bulk_move_lru_tail+0x2b, the
use-after-free should be in below codes:
man = &b
Hi Ray,
well those patches doesn't make sense, the pointer is only local to the
function.
Regards,
Christian.
Am 10.09.2018 um 10:57 schrieb Huang Rui:
It avoids to be refered again after freed.
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui
Cc: Christian König
Cc: Tom StDenis
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo
It avoids to be refered again after freed.
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui
Cc: Christian K??nig
Cc: Tom StDenis
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index 138c989..d3ef5f8 100644
--- a/drivers/
12 matches
Mail list logo
