Dear Nicholas, dear Eric, dear Augustin,
Am 18.10.21 um 19:14 schrieb Kazlauskas, Nicholas:
On 2021-10-15 7:53 p.m., Mike Lothian wrote:
This patch seems to change z8 - not that I know what z8 or z9 are
It's a little misleading but the patch and terminology is correct.
Z9 is the usecase for
On 2021-10-15 7:53 p.m., Mike Lothian wrote:
This patch seems to change z8 - not that I know what z8 or z9 are
It's a little misleading but the patch and terminology is correct.
Z9 is the usecase for these watermarks even if the calculation is shared
with Z8/Z9.
Regards,
Nicholas Kazlauskas
This patch seems to change z8 - not that I know what z8 or z9 are
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 19:44, Agustin Gutierrez
wrote:
>
> From: Eric Yang
>
> [Why]
> Z9 latency is higher than when we originally tuned the watermark
> parameters, causing underflow. Increasing the value until the latency
> issu
From: Eric Yang
[Why]
Z9 latency is higher than when we originally tuned the watermark
parameters, causing underflow. Increasing the value until the latency
issues is resolved.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas
Acked-by: Agustin Gutierrez Sanchez
Signed-off-by: Eric Yang
---
drivers/gpu/drm/a
