On 2023-09-26 12:39, Alex Deucher wrote:
I think this was an abstraction back from when
kfd supported both radeon and amdgpu. Since we just
support amdgpu now, there is no more need for this and
we can use the amdgpu structures directly.
This also avoids having the kfd_cu_info structures on
On 2023-09-26 15:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023, at 20:47, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
From: Arnd Bergmann
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdkfd: drop struct kfd_cu_info
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023, at 18:39, Alex Deucher wrote:
I think this was an abstraction back from when kfd
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023, at 20:47, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
>> From: Arnd Bergmann
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdkfd: drop struct kfd_cu_info
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023, at 18:39, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> > I think this was an abstraction back from when kfd supp
[Public]
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnd Bergmann
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 1:49 PM
> To: Deucher, Alexander ; amd-
> g...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdkfd: drop struct kfd_cu_info
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023, at 18:39, Alex De
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023, at 18:39, Alex Deucher wrote:
> I think this was an abstraction back from when
> kfd supported both radeon and amdgpu. Since we just
> support amdgpu now, there is no more need for this and
> we can use the amdgpu structures directly.
>
> This also avoids having the
I think this was an abstraction back from when
kfd supported both radeon and amdgpu. Since we just
support amdgpu now, there is no more need for this and
we can use the amdgpu structures directly.
This also avoids having the kfd_cu_info structures on
the stack when inlining which can blow up the
