From: Xiaohui Zhang <xiaohuizh...@ruc.edu.cn>
[ Upstream commit 0381ac3ca2e727d4dfb7264d9416a8ba6bb6c18b ]
Similar to the handling of amdgpu_sa_bo_next_hole in commit 6a15f3ff19a8
("drm/amdgpu: Initialize fences array entries in amdgpu_sa_bo_next_hole"),
we thought a patch might be needed here as well.
The entries were only initialized once in radeon_sa_bo_new. If a fence
wasn't signalled yet in the first radeon_sa_bo_next_hole call, but then
got signalled before a later radeon_sa_bo_next_hole call, it could
destroy the fence but leave its pointer in the array, resulting in
use-after-free in radeon_sa_bo_new.
Signed-off-by: Xiaohui Zhang <xiaohuizh...@ruc.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c
index 310c322c7112..0981948bd9ed 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c
@@ -267,6 +267,8 @@ static bool radeon_sa_bo_next_hole(struct radeon_sa_manager
*sa_manager,
for (i = 0; i < RADEON_NUM_RINGS; ++i) {
struct radeon_sa_bo *sa_bo;
+ fences[i] = NULL;
+
if (list_empty(&sa_manager->flist[i])) {
continue;
}
@@ -332,10 +334,8 @@ int radeon_sa_bo_new(struct radeon_device *rdev,
spin_lock(&sa_manager->wq.lock);
do {
- for (i = 0; i < RADEON_NUM_RINGS; ++i) {
- fences[i] = NULL;
+ for (i = 0; i < RADEON_NUM_RINGS; ++i)
tries[i] = 0;
- }
do {
radeon_sa_bo_try_free(sa_manager);
--
2.35.1
