;>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> When we started this patch series, the workload hint was a part of
> the ctx_flag only,
> >>>>
> >>>> But we changed that after the design review, to make it more like how
> we are handling PSTA
gt;>
>>>>
>>>> When we started this patch series, the workload hint was a part of the
>>>> ctx_flag only,
>>>>
>>>> But we changed that after the design review, to make it more like how we
>>>> are handling PSTATE.
>>>>
] drm/amdgpu: add UAPI for workload hints to ctx ioctl
Well that sounds like being able to optionally set it after context creation is
actually the right approach.
VA-API could set it as soon as we know that this is a video codec application.
Vulkan can set it depending on what features are used
nt was a part of the
>>> ctx_flag only,
>>>
>>> But we changed that after the design review, to make it more like how we
>>> are handling PSTATE.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Details:
>>>
>>> https://patchwork.freed
to:amaranath.somalapu...@amd.com>; Koenig, Christian
<mailto:christian.koe...@amd.com>
*Subject:* Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/amdgpu: add UAPI for
workload hints to ctx ioctl
I think we should do it differently because this interface
will be mostly u
ged that after the design review, to make it more like how we
>> are handling PSTATE.
>>
>>
>>
>> Details:
>>
>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/496111/
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Shashank
>>
>>
>>
>> *
deuc...@amd.com>;
Somalapuram, Amaranath
<mailto:amaranath.somalapu...@amd.com>; Koenig, Christian
<mailto:christian.koe...@amd.com>
*Subject:* Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/amdgpu: add UAPI for workload
hints to ctx ioctl
I think we should do it differently because this inter
etails:
>
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/496111/
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Shashank
>
>
>
> *From:* Marek Olšák
> *Sent:* 21 March 2023 04:05
> *To:* Sharma, Shashank
> *Cc:* amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Deucher, Alexander
> ; Somalapuram,
*To:* Sharma, Shashank
*Cc:* amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Deucher, Alexander
; Somalapuram, Amaranath
; Koenig, Christian
*Subject:* Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/amdgpu: add UAPI for workload hints
to ctx ioctl
I think we should do it differently because this interface will be
mostly unused
: Marek Olšák
Sent: 21 March 2023 04:05
To: Sharma, Shashank
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Deucher, Alexander
; Somalapuram, Amaranath
; Koenig, Christian
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/amdgpu: add UAPI for workload hints to ctx ioctl
I think we should do it differently because
I think we should do it differently because this interface will be mostly
unused by open source userspace in its current form.
Let's set the workload hint in drm_amdgpu_ctx_in::flags, and that will be
immutable for the lifetime of the context. No other interface is needed.
Marek
On Mon, Sep 26,
Am 2022-09-26 um 17:40 schrieb Shashank Sharma:
Allow the user to specify a workload hint to the kernel.
We can use these to tweak the dpm heuristics to better match
the workload for improved performance.
V3: Create only set() workload UAPI (Christian)
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Am 26.09.22 um 23:40 schrieb Shashank Sharma:
Allow the user to specify a workload hint to the kernel.
We can use these to tweak the dpm heuristics to better match
the workload for improved performance.
V3: Create only set() workload UAPI (Christian)
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Signed-off-by:
Allow the user to specify a workload hint to the kernel.
We can use these to tweak the dpm heuristics to better match
the workload for improved performance.
V3: Create only set() workload UAPI (Christian)
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma
---
14 matches
Mail list logo
