Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/vmwgfx: Inline ttm_bo_mmap() into vmwgfx driver

2021-04-21 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 09:01:00AM +0200, Christian König wrote: > Am 20.04.21 um 22:53 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:23 PM Felix Kuehling > > wrote: > > > > > > Am 2021-04-20 um 4:51 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter: > > > > > > Whole series is Reviewed-by: Christian König >

Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/vmwgfx: Inline ttm_bo_mmap() into vmwgfx driver

2021-04-21 Thread Christian König
Am 20.04.21 um 22:53 schrieb Daniel Vetter: On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:23 PM Felix Kuehling wrote: Am 2021-04-20 um 4:51 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter: Whole series is Reviewed-by: Christian König Thanks a lot. If I'm not mistaken, the patches at [1] need to go in first. So it could take a a

Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/vmwgfx: Inline ttm_bo_mmap() into vmwgfx driver

2021-04-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:23 PM Felix Kuehling wrote: > > > Am 2021-04-20 um 4:51 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter: > >>> Whole series is Reviewed-by: Christian König > >> Thanks a lot. If I'm not mistaken, the patches at [1] need to go in first. > >> So it could take a a bit until this lands. > >> >

Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/vmwgfx: Inline ttm_bo_mmap() into vmwgfx driver

2021-04-20 Thread Felix Kuehling
Am 2021-04-20 um 4:51 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter: >>> Whole series is Reviewed-by: Christian König >> Thanks a lot. If I'm not mistaken, the patches at [1] need to go in first. >> So it could take a a bit until this lands. >> >> Otherwise, this series could go through the same tree as [1] if

Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/vmwgfx: Inline ttm_bo_mmap() into vmwgfx driver

2021-04-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 09:51:27AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 16.04.21 um 15:51 schrieb Christian König: > > Am 16.04.21 um 15:46 schrieb Christian König: > > > Am 16.04.21 um 15:31 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann: > > > > The vmwgfx driver is the only remaining user of ttm_bo_mmap().

Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/vmwgfx: Inline ttm_bo_mmap() into vmwgfx driver

2021-04-20 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Hi Am 16.04.21 um 15:51 schrieb Christian König: Am 16.04.21 um 15:46 schrieb Christian König: Am 16.04.21 um 15:31 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann: The vmwgfx driver is the only remaining user of ttm_bo_mmap(). Inline the code. The internal helper ttm_bo_vm_lookup() is now also part of vmwgfx as

Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/vmwgfx: Inline ttm_bo_mmap() into vmwgfx driver

2021-04-16 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Hi Am 16.04.21 um 15:46 schrieb Christian König: Am 16.04.21 um 15:31 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann: The vmwgfx driver is the only remaining user of ttm_bo_mmap(). Inline the code. The internal helper ttm_bo_vm_lookup() is now also part of vmwgfx as vmw_bo_vm_lookup(). v2: * replace pr_err()

Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/vmwgfx: Inline ttm_bo_mmap() into vmwgfx driver

2021-04-16 Thread Christian König
Am 16.04.21 um 15:46 schrieb Christian König: Am 16.04.21 um 15:31 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann: The vmwgfx driver is the only remaining user of ttm_bo_mmap(). Inline the code. The internal helper ttm_bo_vm_lookup() is now also part of vmwgfx as vmw_bo_vm_lookup(). v2: * replace pr_err() with

Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/vmwgfx: Inline ttm_bo_mmap() into vmwgfx driver

2021-04-16 Thread Christian König
Am 16.04.21 um 15:31 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann: The vmwgfx driver is the only remaining user of ttm_bo_mmap(). Inline the code. The internal helper ttm_bo_vm_lookup() is now also part of vmwgfx as vmw_bo_vm_lookup(). v2: * replace pr_err() with drm_err() (Zack) Signed-off-by: Thomas

[PATCH v3 5/7] drm/vmwgfx: Inline ttm_bo_mmap() into vmwgfx driver

2021-04-16 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
The vmwgfx driver is the only remaining user of ttm_bo_mmap(). Inline the code. The internal helper ttm_bo_vm_lookup() is now also part of vmwgfx as vmw_bo_vm_lookup(). v2: * replace pr_err() with drm_err() (Zack) Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann Reviewed-by: Zack Rusin ---