RE: [PATCH 16/19] drm/amdkfd: Update PM4 packet headers

2017-08-16 Thread Deucher, Alexander
> -Original Message- > From: Kuehling, Felix > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 6:34 PM > To: Deucher, Alexander; Oded Gabbay; Bridgman, John > Cc: amd-gfx list > Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/19] drm/amdkfd: Update PM4 packet headers > > On 2017-08-16 12:10 PM,

Re: [PATCH 16/19] drm/amdkfd: Update PM4 packet headers

2017-08-16 Thread Felix Kuehling
On 2017-08-16 12:10 PM, Deucher, Alexander wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Kuehling, Felix >> Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 9:20 PM >> To: Oded Gabbay; Bridgman, John; Deucher, Alexander >> Cc: amd-gfx list >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/19] drm/amdkfd

Re: [PATCH 16/19] drm/amdkfd: Update PM4 packet headers

2017-08-16 Thread Felix Kuehling
work with Kaveri anymore ? >>>>> Kaveri got the same firmware changes, mostly for scratch memory >>>>> support. >>>>> The Kaveri firmware headers name the structures and fields a bit >>>>> differently >>>>> but they

Re: [PATCH 16/19] drm/amdkfd: Update PM4 packet headers

2017-08-16 Thread Oded Gabbay
h Kaveri anymore ? >>>>> >>>>> Kaveri got the same firmware changes, mostly for scratch memory >>>>> support. >>>>> The Kaveri firmware headers name the structures and fields a bit >>>>> differently >>>>

RE: [PATCH 16/19] drm/amdkfd: Update PM4 packet headers

2017-08-12 Thread Bridgman, John
t they should be binary compatible. So we simplified the code to use only >one set of headers. I'll grab a Kaveri system to confirm that it works. > >Regards, > Felix > >From: Oded Gabbay <oded.gab...@gmail.com> >Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2017 11:10 AM >To: Kuehling,

Re: [PATCH 16/19] drm/amdkfd: Update PM4 packet headers

2017-08-12 Thread Oded Gabbay
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 12:56 AM, Felix Kuehling wrote: > To match current firmware. The map process packet has been extended > to support scratch. This is a non-backwards compatible change and > it's about two years old. So no point keeping the old version around >