Dänzer
; Tuikov, Luben ; Koenig, Christian
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/4] drm/amdgpu: Add software ring callbacks for gfx9 (v7)
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
Yes, thanks for helping explanation.
Regards,
Likun
-Original Message-
From: Zhu, Jiadong
Sent: Saturday, October 8, 2022 1:17 PM
; Koenig, Christian
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/4] drm/amdgpu: Add software ring callbacks for gfx9 (v7)
I think Likun means to stop creating sw ring if there is no gfx ring existed.
Thanks,
Jiadong
-Original Message-
From: Zhang, Hawking
Sent: Saturday, October 8, 2022 12:37 PM
To: Gao
, Luben ; Zhu, Jiadong
; Koenig, Christian
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/4] drm/amdgpu: Add software ring callbacks for gfx9 (v7)
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
I don't think so. In such case, current cwsr and user queue mechanism handle
the pre-emption very well. The command submission actually
: [PATCH 2/4] drm/amdgpu: Add software ring callbacks for gfx9 (v7)
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
Shall we need to deal with the situation that no real gfx ring exist?
(adev->gfx.num_gfx_rings is 0)
Regards,
Likun
-Original Message-
From: amd-gfx On Behalf Of
jiadong@amd.com
S
, October 8, 2022 11:52
To: Zhu, Jiadong ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Grodzovsky, Andrey ; Michel Dänzer
; Tuikov, Luben ; Zhu, Jiadong
; Koenig, Christian
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/4] drm/amdgpu: Add software ring callbacks for gfx9 (v7)
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
Shall we need
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
Shall we need to deal with the situation that no real gfx ring exist?
(adev->gfx.num_gfx_rings is 0)
Regards,
Likun
-Original Message-
From: amd-gfx On Behalf Of
jiadong@amd.com
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 5:07 PM
To:
