Re: [PATCH 6/9] drm/amdgpu: separate IH and IRQ funcs

2018-09-26 Thread Christian König
Am 26.09.2018 um 11:16 schrieb Huang, Ray: -Original Message- From: Christian König [mailto:ckoenig.leichtzumer...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 4:09 PM To: Huang, Ray Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] drm/amdgpu: separate IH and IRQ funcs Am

RE: [PATCH 6/9] drm/amdgpu: separate IH and IRQ funcs

2018-09-26 Thread Huang, Ray
> -Original Message- > From: Christian König [mailto:ckoenig.leichtzumer...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 4:09 PM > To: Huang, Ray > Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] drm/amdgpu: separate IH and IRQ funcs > > Am 26.

Re: [PATCH 6/9] drm/amdgpu: separate IH and IRQ funcs

2018-09-26 Thread Christian König
Am 26.09.2018 um 08:05 schrieb Huang Rui: On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 02:38:17PM +0200, Christian König wrote: One for the ring buffer and one for the IV handling. Signed-off-by: Christian König Reviewed-by: Huang Rui How about merge amdgpu_ih.c into amdgpu_irq.c? As I think, we don't need two

Re: [PATCH 6/9] drm/amdgpu: separate IH and IRQ funcs

2018-09-26 Thread Huang Rui
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 02:38:17PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > One for the ring buffer and one for the IV handling. > > Signed-off-by: Christian König Reviewed-by: Huang Rui How about merge amdgpu_ih.c into amdgpu_irq.c? As I think, we don't need two common interrupt handle files. IH is