Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] drm/amdgpu/vcn: Disable indirect SRAM on Vangogh broken BIOSes

2023-04-24 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 07:15:22PM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote: > commit 542a56e8eb4467ae654eefab31ff194569db39cd upstream. > > The VCN firmware loading path enables the indirect SRAM mode if it's > advertised as supported. We might have some cases of FW issues that > prevents this mode to

Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] drm/amdgpu/vcn: Disable indirect SRAM on Vangogh broken BIOSes

2023-04-20 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
On 20/04/2023 12:56, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > [...] > That's 3000+ emails ago for me :) /head_exploding this is > 1000 emails per day, wow...my sympathies to you heh > [...] >> tl;dr: the offender is present on 6.1.y, but this fix is not, hence I'm >> hereby requesting the merge.

Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] drm/amdgpu/vcn: Disable indirect SRAM on Vangogh broken BIOSes

2023-04-20 Thread gre...@linuxfoundation.org
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 12:36:00PM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote: > On 20/04/2023 12:02, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > >> [...] > >>> Which "one" are you referring to here? > >>> > >>> confused, > >>> > >>> greg k-h > >> > >> This one, sent in this email thread. > > > > I don't have

Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] drm/amdgpu/vcn: Disable indirect SRAM on Vangogh broken BIOSes

2023-04-20 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
On 20/04/2023 12:02, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: >> [...] >>> Which "one" are you referring to here? >>> >>> confused, >>> >>> greg k-h >> >> This one, sent in this email thread. > > I don't have "this email thread" anymore, remember, some of us get > thousand+ emails a day... I don't

Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] drm/amdgpu/vcn: Disable indirect SRAM on Vangogh broken BIOSes

2023-04-20 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:04 AM gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 09:59:17AM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote: > > On 20/04/2023 09:42, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > > [...] > > >> @Greg, can you pick this one? Thanks! > > > > > > Which "one" are you

Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] drm/amdgpu/vcn: Disable indirect SRAM on Vangogh broken BIOSes

2023-04-20 Thread gre...@linuxfoundation.org
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 09:59:17AM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote: > On 20/04/2023 09:42, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > [...] > >> @Greg, can you pick this one? Thanks! > > > > Which "one" are you referring to here? > > > > confused, > > > > greg k-h > > This one, sent in this email

Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] drm/amdgpu/vcn: Disable indirect SRAM on Vangogh broken BIOSes

2023-04-20 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
On 20/04/2023 09:42, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > [...] >> @Greg, can you pick this one? Thanks! > > Which "one" are you referring to here? > > confused, > > greg k-h This one, sent in this email thread. The title of the patch is "drm/amdgpu/vcn: Disable indirect SRAM on Vangogh broken

Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] drm/amdgpu/vcn: Disable indirect SRAM on Vangogh broken BIOSes

2023-04-20 Thread gre...@linuxfoundation.org
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 09:36:28AM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote: > On 19/04/2023 17:04, Deucher, Alexander wrote: > > [...] > >> So, let me check if I understood properly: there are 2 trees (-fixes and > >> -next), > >> and the problem is that their merge onto mainline happens apart and

Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] drm/amdgpu/vcn: Disable indirect SRAM on Vangogh broken BIOSes

2023-04-20 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
On 19/04/2023 17:04, Deucher, Alexander wrote: > [...] >> So, let me check if I understood properly: there are 2 trees (-fixes and >> -next), >> and the problem is that their merge onto mainline happens apart and there >> are kind of duplicate commits, that were first merged on -fixes, then "re-

RE: [PATCH 6.1.y] drm/amdgpu/vcn: Disable indirect SRAM on Vangogh broken BIOSes

2023-04-19 Thread Deucher, Alexander
; ker...@gpiccoli.net; > kernel-...@igalia.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] drm/amdgpu/vcn: Disable indirect SRAM on > Vangogh broken BIOSes > > On 19/04/2023 10:16, Deucher, Alexander wrote: > > [...] > >> This is quite strange for me, we have 2 commit hashes pointing

Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] drm/amdgpu/vcn: Disable indirect SRAM on Vangogh broken BIOSes

2023-04-19 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
On 19/04/2023 10:16, Deucher, Alexander wrote: > [...] >> This is quite strange for me, we have 2 commit hashes pointing to the >> *same* commit, and each one is present..in a different release !!?! >> Since I've marked this patch as fixing 82132ecc5432 originally, 6.1.y stable >> misses it, since

RE: [PATCH 6.1.y] drm/amdgpu/vcn: Disable indirect SRAM on Vangogh broken BIOSes

2023-04-19 Thread Deucher, Alexander
[Public] > -Original Message- > From: Guilherme G. Piccoli > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2023 6:15 PM > To: sta...@vger.kernel.org > Cc: gre...@linuxfoundation.org; sas...@kernel.org; amd- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org; Deucher, Alexander > ; Zhu, James ; Liu, > Leo ; ker...@gpiccoli.net;