Am 08.11.2017 um 18:37 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 08/11/17 05:41 PM, Christian König wrote:
Am 08.11.2017 um 17:36 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 08/11/17 03:59 PM, Christian König wrote:
Instead of having a pointless wrapper or call the underlying ww_mutex
function directly.
Not sure I can agree
On 08/11/17 05:41 PM, Christian König wrote:
> Am 08.11.2017 um 17:36 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
>> On 08/11/17 03:59 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>> Instead of having a pointless wrapper or call the underlying ww_mutex
>>> function directly.
>> Not sure I can agree it's pointless, since it recently
Am 08.11.2017 um 17:36 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 08/11/17 03:59 PM, Christian König wrote:
Instead of having a pointless wrapper or call the underlying ww_mutex
function directly.
Not sure I can agree it's pointless, since it recently took me a while
to realize that unlocking bo->resv is
On 08/11/17 03:59 PM, Christian König wrote:
> Instead of having a pointless wrapper or call the underlying ww_mutex
> function directly.
Not sure I can agree it's pointless, since it recently took me a while
to realize that unlocking bo->resv is essentially the same as
unreserving the BO.
