Re: Latest drm-next-4.9-wip is causing gfx kernel thread to be pegged 100% running piglit

On Sunday, September 18, 2016 8:06:51 PM EDT Shawn Starr wrote: > Looks like something broke in drm-next-4.9-wip, unsure which change did. > > When running: piglit tests/gpu summary/amdgpu > It's spinning in: 82.37%82.37% [kernel] [k]

Latest drm-next-4.9-wip is causing gfx kernel thread to be pegged 100% running piglit

Looks like something broke in drm-next-4.9-wip, unsure which change did. When running: piglit tests/gpu summary/amdgpu Also triggers: [ 1848.505498] [drm:amdgpu_cs_ioctl [amdgpu]] *ERROR* ttm_eu_reserve_buffers failed. Will test 4.8-rc6 vanilla to see if something broke there. Thanks, Shawn

Re: [PATCH 4/6] drm/radeon: Provide page_flip_target hook

Hi Michel, all your patches, both the already merged kernel bits in radeon/amdgpu and also all the userspace bits in libdrm/ati-ddx/amdgpu-ddx are all Reviewed-and-tested-by: Mario Kleiner I successfully tested with old/current userspace and the new userspace

Re: [pull] radeon and amdgpu drm-next-4.9

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 06:07:36PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 04:42:43PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > >> drm/amdgpu: skip suspend/resume on DRM_SWITCH_POWER_DYNAMIC_OFF > >> drm/radeon:

[PATCH 3/3] drm/amdgpu: set gfx clock gating for tonga/polaris.

Change-Id: I65d9858b8ca0789c5d82db2f8893b7c10fc6f471 Signed-off-by: Rex Zhu --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c | 77 +++ 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c

[PATCH 2/3] drm/amdgpu: set system clock gating for tonga/polaris.

Change-Id: Ie66afaea8b30c4b7b6d491c7aa63775e4a5cd6e1 Signed-off-by: Rex Zhu --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vi.c | 61 + 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vi.c index

Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm/amdgpu:fix RB cost calculator

Alex fixed this up in a rather complete series for all engines/rings. Christian. Am 18.09.2016 um 05:47 schrieb Liu, Monk: Is that applied to all ring ? Cuz seems only GFX ring each lot of dw per submit ... BR Monk -Original Message- From: Christian König