Well that's quite a patch set.
First of all can you separate this a bit more by driver? I'm assuming we
maintainers are supposed to pick that up and apply it.
radeon and amdgpu can stick together since that is mostly Alex and me,
but I'm not sure if we want to do some of the suggested
Hi Lee,
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 09:49:47PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c:226: warning: Function parameter or
> member 'dev' not described in 'radeon_info_ioctl'
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c:226:
Hi Lee,
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 09:49:40PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> Unfortunately, a suitable one didn't already exist.
>
> Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c:637:6: warning: no previous prototype
> for ‘radeon_device_is_virtual’
On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 06:41:38PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Nov 2020, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> > Hi Christian.
> >
> > > I'm not sure if we want to do some of the suggested changes to radeon.
> >
> > All patches for radeon looks good to me except "drm/radeon/radeon: Move
> >
Hi Christian.
> I'm not sure if we want to do some of the suggested changes to radeon.
All patches for radeon looks good to me except "drm/radeon/radeon: Move
prototype into shared header".
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg
from me to have them applied (except the shared header one).
I can reply to the
