RE: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/sdma5.2: soft reset sdma blocks before setup and start sdma

2020-12-10 Thread Huang, Ray
[AMD Public Use] Reviewed-by: Huang Rui -Original Message- From: Hou, Xiaomeng (Matthew) Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2020 9:00 PM To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Huang, Ray ; Gao, Likun ; Hou, Xiaomeng (Matthew) Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/sdma5.2: soft reset sdma blocks

Re: [PATCH] amdgpu: resize BAR0 to the maximum available size, even if it doesn't cover VRAM

2020-12-10 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Christian König may or may not have written... > Am 10.12.20 um 14:59 schrieb Darren Salt: > > I demand that Christian König may or may not have written... > > [snip] >> My current kernel has another patch, applied on top of this patch, which >> allows ignoring the size list. As

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/amd/display: Add freesync video modes based on preferred modes

2020-12-10 Thread Shashank Sharma
On 11/12/20 12:18 am, Aurabindo Pillai wrote: > [Why] > If experimental freesync video mode module parameter is enabled, add > few extra display modes into the driver's mode list corresponding to common > video frame rates. When userspace sets these modes, no modeset will be > performed (if

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/amd/display: Add module parameter for freesync video mode

2020-12-10 Thread Shashank Sharma
LGTM, Please feel free to use Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma Regards Shashank On 11/12/20 12:18 am, Aurabindo Pillai wrote: > [Why] > Adds a module parameter to enable experimental freesync video mode modeset > optimization. Enabling this mode allows the driver to skip a full modeset when >

Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/amd/display: Skip modeset for front porch change

2020-12-10 Thread Shashank Sharma
On 10/12/20 11:20 pm, Aurabindo Pillai wrote: > On Thu, 2020-12-10 at 18:29 +0530, Shashank Sharma wrote: >> On 10/12/20 8:15 am, Aurabindo Pillai wrote: >>> [Why] >>> Inorder to enable freesync video mode, driver adds extra >>> modes based on preferred modes for common freesync frame rates. >>>

[PATCH 7/7] amdgpu: allow overriding of the GPU's list of supported BAR sizes

2020-12-10 Thread Darren Salt
Some cards don't advertise a BAR size which covers all of the VRAM. Mine, a Sapphire RX 5600 XT Pulse, advertises only 256MB, 512MB and 1GB. Despite this, it works fine with the full 6GB visible via an 8GB BAR. --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h| 2 +-

[PATCH 6/7] pci: allow for overriding the list of advertised BAR sizes

2020-12-10 Thread Darren Salt
This is intended for devices which are known to work with BAR sizes other than those which they advertise; usually larger. --- drivers/pci/setup-res.c | 4 ++-- include/linux/pci.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-res.c

[PATCH 2/7] pci: add BAR bytes->size helper & expose size->bytes helper

2020-12-10 Thread Darren Salt
This is to assist driver modules which do BAR resizing. Signed-off-by: Darren Salt --- drivers/pci/pci.h | 4 include/linux/pci.h | 9 + 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h index 8373d94414e9..9a3837a30369 100644

[PATCH 1/7] pci: export PCI BAR size-reading functions

2020-12-10 Thread Darren Salt
This is to assist driver modules which do BAR resizing. Signed-off-by: Darren Salt --- drivers/pci/pci.c | 2 ++ drivers/pci/pci.h | 2 -- include/linux/pci.h | 4 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c index

[PATCH 4/7] amdgpu: module option controlling whether BAR0 resizing is done

2020-12-10 Thread Darren Salt
--- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h| 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 3 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c| 9 + 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h index

[PATCH 5/7] amdgpu: limit maximum FB BAR size when attempting to enlarge

2020-12-10 Thread Darren Salt
This is coarse, applying to all dGPUs. --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h| 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 8 +++- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c| 9 + 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

[PATCH 3/7] amdgpu: resize BAR0 to the maximum available size, even if it doesn't cover VRAM (v2)

2020-12-10 Thread Darren Salt
This allows BAR0 resizing to be done for cards which don't advertise support for a size large enough to cover the VRAM but which do advertise at least one size larger than the default. For example, my RX 5600 XT, which advertises 256MB, 512MB and 1GB. [v2] rewritten to use PCI helper functions;

[PATCH 0/7] amdgpu, pci: improved BAR resizing support

2020-12-10 Thread Darren Salt
This patch series improves the existing BAR resizing support in amdgpu. By default, it will attempt to resize BAR0 for each dGPU present to cover the VRAM, falling back to smaller sizes if necessary, e.g. if there's not enough address space remaining or support for the size is not advertised.

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Experimental freesync video mode optimization

2020-12-10 Thread Shashank Sharma
Hello Simon, Hope you are doing well, I was helping out Aurabindo and the team with the design, so I have taken the liberty of adding some comments on behalf of the team, Inline. On 11/12/20 3:31 am, Simon Ser wrote: > Hi, > > (CC dri-devel, Pekka and Martin who might be interested in this as

RE: [PATCH 7/7] drm/amdgpu: print what method we are using for runtime pm

2020-12-10 Thread Quan, Evan
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only] Series is acked-by: Evan Quan -Original Message- From: amd-gfx On Behalf Of Alex Deucher Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 5:45 AM To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Deucher, Alexander Subject: [PATCH 7/7] drm/amdgpu: print what

RE: [PATCH 7/7] drm/amdgpu: print what method we are using for runtime pm

2020-12-10 Thread Quan, Evan
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only] Acked-by: Evan Quan -Original Message- From: amd-gfx On Behalf Of Alex Deucher Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 5:45 AM To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Deucher, Alexander Subject: [PATCH 7/7] drm/amdgpu: print what method we

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Experimental freesync video mode optimization

2020-12-10 Thread Simon Ser
Hi, (CC dri-devel, Pekka and Martin who might be interested in this as well.) On Thursday, December 10th, 2020 at 7:48 PM, Aurabindo Pillai wrote: > This patchset enables freesync video mode usecase where the userspace > can request a freesync compatible video mode such that switching to this

[PATCH 6/7] drm/amdgpu: simplify logic in atpx resume handling

2020-12-10 Thread Alex Deucher
Simplify the logic in the runtime resume handling for atpx Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c index

[PATCH 2/7] drm/amdgpu: add check for ACPI power resources

2020-12-10 Thread Alex Deucher
Check if the device has ACPI power resources so we can enable runtime pm if so. Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c | 4 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h

[PATCH 5/7] drm/amdgpu: no need to call pci_ignore_hotplug for _PR3

2020-12-10 Thread Alex Deucher
The platform knows it's doing d3cold. Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c | 9 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c index

[PATCH 7/7] drm/amdgpu: print what method we are using for runtime pm

2020-12-10 Thread Alex Deucher
So we know when it's enabled and what method we are using. Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c index

[PATCH 4/7] drm/amdgpu: support runtime pm for GPUs that support BOCO

2020-12-10 Thread Alex Deucher
Enable runtime pm on non HG/PX BOCO capable boards. Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c index

[PATCH 3/7] drm/amdgpu: update amdgpu_device_supports_boco()

2020-12-10 Thread Alex Deucher
Change it to check if the device has ACPI power resources. Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c

[PATCH 1/7] drm/amdgpu: split BOCO and ATPX handling

2020-12-10 Thread Alex Deucher
In preparation for systems that support d3cold on dGPUs independent of PX/HG. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h| 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 33 --

Re: [PATCH] amdgpu: resize BAR0 to the maximum available size, even if it doesn't cover VRAM

2020-12-10 Thread Christian König
Am 10.12.20 um 14:59 schrieb Darren Salt: I demand that Christian König may or may not have written... Am 10.12.20 um 01:57 schrieb Darren Salt: This allows BAR0 resizing to be done for cards which don't advertise support for a size large enough to cover the VRAM but which do advertise at

Re: [PATCH] amdgpu: resize BAR0 to the maximum available size, even if it doesn't cover VRAM

2020-12-10 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Christian König may or may not have written... > Am 10.12.20 um 01:57 schrieb Darren Salt: >> This allows BAR0 resizing to be done for cards which don't advertise >> support for a size large enough to cover the VRAM but which do advertise >> at least one size larger than the

[PATCH v2 3/3] drm/amd/display: Skip modeset for front porch change

2020-12-10 Thread Aurabindo Pillai
[Why] Inorder to enable freesync video mode, driver adds extra modes based on preferred modes for common freesync frame rates. When commiting these mode changes, a full modeset is not needed. If the change in only in the front porch timing value, skip full modeset and continue using the same

[PATCH v2 2/3] drm/amd/display: Add freesync video modes based on preferred modes

2020-12-10 Thread Aurabindo Pillai
[Why] If experimental freesync video mode module parameter is enabled, add few extra display modes into the driver's mode list corresponding to common video frame rates. When userspace sets these modes, no modeset will be performed (if current mode was one of freesync modes or the base freesync

[PATCH v2 1/3] drm/amd/display: Add module parameter for freesync video mode

2020-12-10 Thread Aurabindo Pillai
[Why] Adds a module parameter to enable experimental freesync video mode modeset optimization. Enabling this mode allows the driver to skip a full modeset when freesync compatible modes are requested by the userspace. This paramters also adds some standard modes based on the connected monitor's

[PATCH v2 0/3] Experimental freesync video mode optimization

2020-12-10 Thread Aurabindo Pillai
Changes in V2 = 1) Add freesync video modes based on preferred modes: * Remove check for connector type before adding freesync compatible modes as VRR support is being checked, and there is no reason to block freesync video support on eDP. * use drm_mode_equal() instead of

Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/amdgpu: check gfx pipe availability before toggling its interrupts

2020-12-10 Thread Alex Deucher
Series is: Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 10:29 AM Hawking Zhang wrote: > > GUI_IDLE interrupts controlled by CP_INT_CNTL_RING0 > are only applicable to me0 pipe0. > > For ASICs that have gfx pipe removed, don't toggle > those bits. > > Signed-off-by: Hawking Zhang >

Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/amd/display: Skip modeset for front porch change

2020-12-10 Thread Aurabindo Pillai
On Thu, 2020-12-10 at 18:29 +0530, Shashank Sharma wrote: > On 10/12/20 8:15 am, Aurabindo Pillai wrote: > > [Why] > > Inorder to enable freesync video mode, driver adds extra > > modes based on preferred modes for common freesync frame rates. > > When commiting these mode changes, a full modeset

Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: take runtime pm reference when we attach a buffer

2020-12-10 Thread Shashank Sharma
On 10/12/20 9:23 pm, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 8:03 AM Shashank Sharma > wrote: >> >> On 10/12/20 3:58 pm, Christian König wrote: >>> Am 10.12.20 um 05:49 schrieb Shashank Sharma: On 09/12/20 11:00 pm, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:41 PM Alex

Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/amd/display: Add freesync video modes based on preferred modes

2020-12-10 Thread Aurabindo Pillai
Hi Shashank, Thanks for the review. Please see my inline responses. On Thu, 2020-12-10 at 18:07 +0530, Shashank Sharma wrote: > Hello Aurabindo, > > > On 10/12/20 8:15 am, Aurabindo Pillai wrote: > > > [Why] > > If experimental freesync video mode module parameter is enabled, > > add > > few

Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: take runtime pm reference when we attach a buffer

2020-12-10 Thread Alex Deucher
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:49 PM Shashank Sharma wrote: > > > On 09/12/20 11:00 pm, Alex Deucher wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:41 PM Alex Deucher wrote: > >> And drop it when we detach. If the shared buffer is in vram, > >> we need to make sure we don't put the device into runtime > >>

Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: take runtime pm reference when we attach a buffer

2020-12-10 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 8:03 AM Shashank Sharma wrote: > > > On 10/12/20 3:58 pm, Christian König wrote: > > Am 10.12.20 um 05:49 schrieb Shashank Sharma: > >> On 09/12/20 11:00 pm, Alex Deucher wrote: > >>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:41 PM Alex Deucher wrote: > And drop it when we detach.

Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/sdma5.2: soft reset sdma blocks before setup and start sdma

2020-12-10 Thread Deucher, Alexander
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only] Acked-by: Alex Deucher From: amd-gfx on behalf of Xiaomeng Hou Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2020 7:59 AM To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Gao, Likun ; Huang, Ray ; Hou, Xiaomeng (Matthew) Subject:

Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/pm: add deep sleep control for uclk and fclk

2020-12-10 Thread Deucher, Alexander
[AMD Public Use] Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher From: Quan, Evan Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2020 3:44 AM To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Deucher, Alexander ; Quan, Evan Subject: [PATCH] drm/amd/pm: add deep sleep control for uclk and fclk These are

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/amd/pm: update the data strucutre for SMU metrics exchange

2020-12-10 Thread Deucher, Alexander
[AMD Public Use] Series is: Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher From: Quan, Evan Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2020 2:10 AM To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Deucher, Alexander ; Quan, Evan Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/amd/pm: update the data strucutre for SMU metrics

Re: [PATCH v2 13/20] drm/nouveau: Remove references to struct drm_device.pdev

2020-12-10 Thread Jeremy Cline
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 08:56:08AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 09.12.20 um 19:04 schrieb Jeremy Cline: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 11:35:35AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > > Using struct drm_device.pdev is deprecated. Convert nouveau to struct > > >

Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: take runtime pm reference when we attach a buffer

2020-12-10 Thread Shashank Sharma
On 10/12/20 3:58 pm, Christian König wrote: > Am 10.12.20 um 05:49 schrieb Shashank Sharma: >> On 09/12/20 11:00 pm, Alex Deucher wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:41 PM Alex Deucher wrote: And drop it when we detach. If the shared buffer is in vram, we need to make sure we don't

[PATCH] drm/amdgpu/sdma5.2: soft reset sdma blocks before setup and start sdma

2020-12-10 Thread Xiaomeng Hou
Without doing the soft reset, register mmSDMA0_GFX_RB_WPTR's value could not be reset to 0 when sdma block resumes. That would cause the ring buffer's read and write pointers not equal and ring test fail. So add the soft reset step. Signed-off-by: Xiaomeng Hou ---

Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/amd/display: Skip modeset for front porch change

2020-12-10 Thread Shashank Sharma
On 10/12/20 8:15 am, Aurabindo Pillai wrote: > [Why] > Inorder to enable freesync video mode, driver adds extra > modes based on preferred modes for common freesync frame rates. > When commiting these mode changes, a full modeset is not needed. > If the change in only in the front porch timing

Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/amd/display: Add freesync video modes based on preferred modes

2020-12-10 Thread Shashank Sharma
Hello Aurabindo, On 10/12/20 8:15 am, Aurabindo Pillai wrote: > [Why] > If experimental freesync video mode module parameter is enabled, add > few extra display modes into the driver's mode list corresponding to common > video frame rates. When userspace sets these modes, no modeset will be >

Re: [PATCH v2 13/20] drm/nouveau: Remove references to struct drm_device.pdev

2020-12-10 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Hi Am 09.12.20 um 19:04 schrieb Jeremy Cline: Hi, On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 11:35:35AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: Using struct drm_device.pdev is deprecated. Convert nouveau to struct drm_device.dev. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann Cc: Ben Skeggs ---

Re: [PATCH v2 09/20] drm/i915: Remove references to struct drm_device.pdev

2020-12-10 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Hi Am 10.12.20 um 10:03 schrieb Jani Nikula: On Tue, 08 Dec 2020, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: ping for a review of the i915 patches What did you have in mind regarding merging the series? Should we just pick the patches up? Originally I thought that individual trees would merge their rsp

Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: take runtime pm reference when we attach a buffer

2020-12-10 Thread Christian König
Am 10.12.20 um 05:49 schrieb Shashank Sharma: On 09/12/20 11:00 pm, Alex Deucher wrote: On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:41 PM Alex Deucher wrote: And drop it when we detach. If the shared buffer is in vram, we need to make sure we don't put the device into runtime suspend. Signed-off-by: Alex

Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/amd/display: Skip modeset for front porch change

2020-12-10 Thread Christian König
Am 10.12.20 um 03:45 schrieb Aurabindo Pillai: [Why] Inorder to enable freesync video mode, driver adds extra modes based on preferred modes for common freesync frame rates. When commiting these mode changes, a full modeset is not needed. If the change in only in the front porch timing value,

Re: [PATCH] amdgpu: resize BAR0 to the maximum available size, even if it doesn't cover VRAM

2020-12-10 Thread Christian König
Am 10.12.20 um 01:57 schrieb Darren Salt: This allows BAR0 resizing to be done for cards which don't advertise support for a size large enough to cover the VRAM but which do advertise at least one size larger than the default. For example, my RX 5600 XT, which advertises 256MB, 512MB and 1GB.

Re: [PATCH] amdgpu: don't treat BAR resize failure due to unsupported requested size as an error

2020-12-10 Thread Christian König
Am 09.12.20 um 19:55 schrieb Darren Salt: On the resize attempt failing with -EINVAL, instead report an informational message indicating that the requested BAR size is not listed as supported by the VBIOS. Without this, as I have an RX 5600 XT which lists only 256MB, 512MB and 1024MB as

Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/scheduler: Job timeout handler returns status (v2)

2020-12-10 Thread Steven Price
On 10/12/2020 02:14, Luben Tuikov wrote: This patch does not change current behaviour. The driver's job timeout handler now returns status indicating back to the DRM layer whether the task (job) was successfully aborted or whether more time should be given to the task to complete. I find the

Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/scheduler: Job timeout handler returns status (v2)

2020-12-10 Thread Christian König
Am 10.12.20 um 10:31 schrieb Lucas Stach: Hi Luben, Am Mittwoch, den 09.12.2020, 21:14 -0500 schrieb Luben Tuikov: [SNIP] -static void etnaviv_sched_timedout_job(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job) +static enum drm_task_status etnaviv_sched_timedout_job(struct drm_sched_job +

RE: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Return -EINVAL when whole gpu reset happened

2020-12-10 Thread Liu, Cheng Zhe
[AMD Public Use] Hi Christian, I discussed with @Liu, Monk and @Chen, Horace, it hasn't decided yet. I'll add you and Alex to the mailing list. -Original Message- From: Christian König Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2020 5:29 PM To: Liu, Cheng Zhe ; Koenig, Christian ;

Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/scheduler: Job timeout handler returns status (v2)

2020-12-10 Thread Lucas Stach
Hi Luben, Am Mittwoch, den 09.12.2020, 21:14 -0500 schrieb Luben Tuikov: > This patch does not change current behaviour. > > The driver's job timeout handler now returns > status indicating back to the DRM layer whether > the task (job) was successfully aborted or whether > more time should be

Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Return -EINVAL when whole gpu reset happened

2020-12-10 Thread Christian König
Hi Cheng, well with whom you discussed that? Such discussions should happen on the mailing list and at minimum include Alex and me. Anyway as discussed before this is not acceptable. We already discussed this years ago and the behavior is fixed and not changeable. Regards, Christian. Am

Re: [PATCH v2 09/20] drm/i915: Remove references to struct drm_device.pdev

2020-12-10 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 08 Dec 2020, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > ping for a review of the i915 patches What did you have in mind regarding merging the series? Should we just pick the patches up? BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center ___ amd-gfx

[PATCH] drm/amd/pm: add deep sleep control for uclk and fclk

2020-12-10 Thread Evan Quan
These are supported by Sienna Cichlid and should be taken into consideration during DS control. Change-Id: I93ed67ae863a91b75d6dfecd87e74029ffafd302 Signed-off-by: Evan Quan --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c | 16 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) diff --git