On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 01:07:13PM -0400, Kazlauskas, Nicholas wrote:
> On 2020-07-28 5:22 a.m., Paul Menzel wrote:
> > Dear Linux folks,
> >
> >
> > Am 25.07.20 um 07:20 schrieb Mazin Rezk:
> > > On Saturday, July 25, 2020 12:59 AM, Duncan wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, 25 Jul 2020 03:03:52
On 2020-07-28 5:22 a.m., Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear Linux folks,
Am 25.07.20 um 07:20 schrieb Mazin Rezk:
On Saturday, July 25, 2020 12:59 AM, Duncan wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jul 2020 03:03:52 + Mazin Rezk wrote:
Am 24.07.20 um 19:33 schrieb Kees Cook:
There was a fix to disable the async
Dear Linux folks,
Am 25.07.20 um 07:20 schrieb Mazin Rezk:
On Saturday, July 25, 2020 12:59 AM, Duncan wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jul 2020 03:03:52 + Mazin Rezk wrote:
Am 24.07.20 um 19:33 schrieb Kees Cook:
There was a fix to disable the async path for this driver that
worked around the bug
On Saturday, July 25, 2020 12:59 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jul 2020 03:03:52 +
> Mazin Rezk mn...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > > Am 24.07.20 um 19:33 schrieb Kees Cook:
> > >
> > > > There was a fix to disable the async path for this driver that
> > > > worked
On Friday, July 24, 2020 5:19 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Kees,
>
> Am 24.07.20 um 19:33 schrieb Kees Cook:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 09:45:18AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> >
> > > Am 24.07.20 um 00:32 schrieb Kees Cook:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 09:10:15PM +, Mazin Rezk
On Sat, 25 Jul 2020 03:03:52 +
Mazin Rezk wrote:
> > Am 24.07.20 um 19:33 schrieb Kees Cook:
> >
> > > There was a fix to disable the async path for this driver that
> > > worked around the bug too, yes? That seems like a safer and more
> > > focused change that doesn't revert the SLUB
On Thursday, July 23, 2020 6:57 PM, Mazin Rezk wrote:
> It seems that I spoke too soon. I ran the system for another hour after
> submitting the patch and the bug just occurred. :/
>
> Sadly, that means the bug isn't really fixed and that I have to go
> investigate further.
>
> At the very
Dear Kees,
Am 24.07.20 um 19:33 schrieb Kees Cook:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 09:45:18AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
Am 24.07.20 um 00:32 schrieb Kees Cook:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 09:10:15PM +, Mazin Rezk wrote:
As Linux 5.8-rc7 is going to be released this Sunday, I wonder, if commit
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 09:45:18AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Am 24.07.20 um 00:32 schrieb Kees Cook:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 09:10:15PM +, Mazin Rezk wrote:
> As Linux 5.8-rc7 is going to be released this Sunday, I wonder, if commit
> 3202fa62f ("slub: relocate freelist pointer to middle
Dear Kees,
Am 24.07.20 um 00:32 schrieb Kees Cook:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 09:10:15PM +, Mazin Rezk wrote:
When amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail is running in the workqueue,
drm_atomic_state_put will get called while amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail is
running, causing a race condition where
Am 24.07.20 um 00:58 schrieb Mazin Rezk:
On Thursday, July 23, 2020 6:32 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 09:10:15PM +, Mazin Rezk wrote:
When amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail is running in the workqueue,
drm_atomic_state_put will get called while amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail is
On Thursday, July 23, 2020 6:32 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 09:10:15PM +, Mazin Rezk wrote:
>
> > When amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail is running in the workqueue,
> > drm_atomic_state_put will get called while amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail is
> > running, causing a race
When amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail is running in the workqueue,
drm_atomic_state_put will get called while amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail is
running, causing a race condition where state (and then dm_state) is
sometimes freed while amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail is running. This bug has
occurred since
It seems that I spoke too soon. I ran the system for another hour after
submitting the patch and the bug just occurred. :/
Sadly, that means the bug isn't really fixed and that I have to go
investigate further.
At the very least, this patch seems to delay the occurrence of the bug
significantly
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 09:10:15PM +, Mazin Rezk wrote:
> When amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail is running in the workqueue,
> drm_atomic_state_put will get called while amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail is
> running, causing a race condition where state (and then dm_state) is
> sometimes freed while
On 2020-07-23 5:10 p.m., Mazin Rezk wrote:
When amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail is running in the workqueue,
drm_atomic_state_put will get called while amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail is
running, causing a race condition where state (and then dm_state) is
sometimes freed while
16 matches
Mail list logo
