Message-
> From: Koenig, Christian
> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 8:41 AM
> To: Russell, Kent ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Fix compile warning in
> amdgpu_fru_read_eeprom
>
> No, problem. I don't know this code but the patch looked k
was fixed and I was breaking and unbreaking it during
rebasing. This thread can be ignored. Time for some coffee.
Kent
-Original Message-
From: Koenig, Christian
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 8:29 AM
To: Russell, Kent ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Fi
ne 29, 2020 8:29 AM
> To: Russell, Kent ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Fix compile warning in
> amdgpu_fru_read_eeprom
>
> Ok, then why does it fix a warning if we make it non-static?
>
> If the function used it compiled under some #ifdef the
tian König
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 8:17 AM
To: Russell, Kent ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Fix compile warning in
amdgpu_fru_read_eeprom
Am 29.06.20 um 14:13 schrieb Kent Russell:
This fixes the missing-prototypes warning for the
amdgpu_fru_read_eeprom funct
u_eeprom.c file.
Kent
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian König
> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 8:17 AM
> To: Russell, Kent ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Fix compile warning in
> amdgpu_fru_read_eeprom
>
> Am 29.06.20 um 14
Am 29.06.20 um 14:13 schrieb Kent Russell:
This fixes the missing-prototypes warning for the amdgpu_fru_read_eeprom
function. Since we declare it in the header, we can make it un-static
Well is it used in different files? Otherwise we might just have unused
code in the module which can potenti
This fixes the missing-prototypes warning for the amdgpu_fru_read_eeprom
function. Since we declare it in the header, we can make it un-static
Signed-off-by: Kent Russell
Reported-by: kernel test robot
Change-Id: I2b9419365cb8b38bcfb6582df53b96c83861d6cf
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fr
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher
From: amd-gfx on behalf of Rex Zhu
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 8:26:07 AM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Zhu, Rex
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Fix compile warning
In function ‘gfx_v9_0_check_fw_write_wait’:
warning
In function ‘gfx_v9_0_check_fw_write_wait’:
warning: enumeration value ‘CHIP_TAHITI’ not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
Always add default case in case there is no match
Signed-off-by: Rex Zhu
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/
On 04/07/2017 03:56 AM, Alex Xie wrote:
warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
Thanks for your patch.
I have fixed it.
Please check in our branch.
Jerry
Change-Id: I317eddd1bd430c98a3c50ec170f592f944081a6e
Signed-off-by: Alex Xie
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu
warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
Change-Id: I317eddd1bd430c98a3c50ec170f592f944081a6e
Signed-off-by: Alex Xie
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
b/drivers
Am 02.01.2017 um 10:23 schrieb Rex Zhu:
warning:
comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
min((size_t)size, bios_size - bios_offset))
Change-Id: Ib77eac5b15d09d169d2e95cff7608b395fb0f64c
Signed-off-by: Rex Zhu
Reviewed-by: Christian König .
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu
warning:
comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
min((size_t)size, bios_size - bios_offset))
Change-Id: Ib77eac5b15d09d169d2e95cff7608b395fb0f64c
Signed-off-by: Rex Zhu
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/driv
13 matches
Mail list logo
