On 2018-11-04 2:20 p.m., Christian König wrote:
> Am 02.11.18 um 19:59 schrieb Kuehling, Felix:
>> On 2018-11-02 9:48 a.m., Christian König wrote:
>>> Vega10 has multiple interrupt rings,
>> I don't think I've seen your code that implements multiple interrupt
>> rings. So it's a bit hard to
Am 02.11.18 um 19:59 schrieb Kuehling, Felix:
On 2018-11-02 9:48 a.m., Christian König wrote:
Vega10 has multiple interrupt rings,
I don't think I've seen your code that implements multiple interrupt
rings. So it's a bit hard to comment.
It's already a while ago, but you actually reviewed it
On 2018-11-02 9:48 a.m., Christian König wrote:
> Vega10 has multiple interrupt rings,
I don't think I've seen your code that implements multiple interrupt
rings. So it's a bit hard to comment. As I understand it, the only way
this could happen is, if the two interrupt rings are handled by
Acked-by: Alex Deucher
From: amd-gfx on behalf of Christian
König
Sent: Friday, November 2, 2018 9:48:07 AM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: fix interrupt spin lock
Vega10 has multiple interrupt rings, so this can be called from
Vega10 has multiple interrupt rings, so this can be called from multiple
calles at the same time resulting in:
[ 71.779334]
[ 71.779406] WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[ 71.779478] 4.19.0-rc1+ #44 Tainted: GW
[ 71.779565]