On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 8:08 AM Christian König
wrote:
>
> The KIQ code path was ignoring the second flush. Also avoid long lines and
> re-calculating the register offsets over and over again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher
> ---
>
The KIQ code path was ignoring the second flush. Also avoid long lines and
re-calculating the register offsets over and over again.
Signed-off-by: Christian König
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c | 29 +--
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff
Am 08.09.23 um 20:58 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
On 2023-09-05 02:04, Christian König wrote:
The KIQ code path was ignoring the second flush. Also avoid long
lines and
re-calculating the register offsets over and over again.
Signed-off-by: Christian König
---
On 2023-09-05 02:04, Christian König wrote:
The KIQ code path was ignoring the second flush. Also avoid long lines and
re-calculating the register offsets over and over again.
Signed-off-by: Christian König
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c | 29 +--
1 file
Am 05.09.23 um 22:45 schrieb Alex Deucher:
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 3:00 AM Christian König
wrote:
The KIQ code path was ignoring the second flush. Also avoid long lines and
re-calculating the register offsets over and over again.
I'd split this into two patches, one for the code cleanup and
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 3:00 AM Christian König
wrote:
>
> The KIQ code path was ignoring the second flush. Also avoid long lines and
> re-calculating the register offsets over and over again.
I'd split this into two patches, one for the code cleanup and one to
fix the missing flush.
Alex
>
>
The KIQ code path was ignoring the second flush. Also avoid long lines and
re-calculating the register offsets over and over again.
Signed-off-by: Christian König
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c | 29 +--
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff
