subject:"\[PATCH 2\/2\] drm\/amdgpu\: Don't call amd_powerplay_destroy\(\) if we don't have powerplay"

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: Don't call amd_powerplay_destroy() if we don't have powerplay

2017-07-02 Thread Alex Deucher

On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 1:13 PM, John Brooks wrote: > amd_powerplay_destroy() expects a handle pointing to a struct pp_instance. > On chips without PowerPlay, pp_handle points to a struct amdgpu_device. The > resulting attempt to kfree() fields of the wrong struct ends in fire:

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: Don't call amd_powerplay_destroy() if we don't have powerplay

2017-07-02 Thread Christian König

Am 01.07.2017 um 19:13 schrieb John Brooks: amd_powerplay_destroy() expects a handle pointing to a struct pp_instance. On chips without PowerPlay, pp_handle points to a struct amdgpu_device. The resulting attempt to kfree() fields of the wrong struct ends in fire: [ 91.560405] BUG: unable to

[PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: Don't call amd_powerplay_destroy() if we don't have powerplay

2017-07-01 Thread John Brooks

amd_powerplay_destroy() expects a handle pointing to a struct pp_instance. On chips without PowerPlay, pp_handle points to a struct amdgpu_device. The resulting attempt to kfree() fields of the wrong struct ends in fire: [ 91.560405] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at