On 2020-03-05 08:29, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> Store ttm bo->offset in struct nouveau_bo instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c | 6
Am 05.03.20 um 14:29 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
Store ttm bo->offset in struct nouveau_bo instead.
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das
Looks like this is the only patch without an rb or at least acked-by.
Can anybody comment or at least throw a quick tested-by on it?
With that done I would say I would
Store ttm bo->offset in struct nouveau_bo instead.
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c | 6 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c | 6 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c |
On 2020-02-19 08:53, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> Store ttm bo->offset in struct nouveau_bo instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c | 6
Store ttm bo->offset in struct nouveau_bo instead.
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c | 6 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c | 6 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c |