On 2019-06-25 11:44 a.m., Koenig, Christian wrote:
> Am 25.06.19 um 10:02 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
>> On 2019-06-24 7:31 p.m., Christian König wrote:
>>> Patches #1 - #3 look good to me, but I'm not sure if the rest is such a
>>> good idea.
>>>
>>> Basically you not only want to use the same FD for
Am 25.06.19 um 10:02 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> On 2019-06-24 7:31 p.m., Christian König wrote:
>> Patches #1 - #3 look good to me, but I'm not sure if the rest is such a
>> good idea.
>>
>> Basically you not only want to use the same FD for CS, but also for
>> basically all buffer functions and as
On 2019-06-24 7:31 p.m., Christian König wrote:
> Patches #1 - #3 look good to me, but I'm not sure if the rest is such a
> good idea.
>
> Basically you not only want to use the same FD for CS, but also for
> basically all buffer functions and as far as I can see we break that here.
How so? The
Patches #1 - #3 look good to me, but I'm not sure if the rest is such a
good idea.
Basically you not only want to use the same FD for CS, but also for
basically all buffer functions and as far as I can see we break that here.
I would rather add a new function to export the KMS handle for a
From: Michel Dänzer
The motivation for these patches is https://bugs.freedesktop.org/110903 .
Patches 1-3 are preparatory.
Patches 4 & 5 are the core patches allowing the issues discussed in the
bug report to be fixed.
Patches 6-8 are further optimizations / cleanups.
Patch 9 is the Mesa
