On 3/2/20 6:16 PM, Christian König wrote:
or else
@@ -222,7 +229,8 @@ struct amdgpu_ring {
struct mutex priority_mutex;
/* protected by priority_mutex */
int priority;
- bool gfx_pipe_priority;
+
+ enum
Am 02.03.20 um 15:20 schrieb Nirmoy:
Hi Christian
On 3/2/20 2:10 PM, Christian König wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
index 24caff085d00..201c6ac7bf9d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
+++
Hi Christian
On 3/2/20 2:10 PM, Christian König wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
index 24caff085d00..201c6ac7bf9d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
@@
Am 02.03.20 um 13:58 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
We were changing compute ring priority while rings were being used
before every job submission which is not recommended. This patch
sets compute queue priority at mqd initialization for gfx8, gfx9 and
gfx10.
Policy: make queue 0 of each pipe as high
We were changing compute ring priority while rings were being used
before every job submission which is not recommended. This patch
sets compute queue priority at mqd initialization for gfx8, gfx9 and
gfx10.
Policy: make queue 0 of each pipe as high priority compute queue
High/normal priority
