From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com>
We left entries without a handler hook in the list, so the list could
keep taking longer to process and use up more memory.
(Ported from amdgpu commit 7eea3e2cd74eed22e982319144e18ae5b1087b78)
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com>
---
src/radeon_drm_queue.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/radeon_drm_queue.c b/src/radeon_drm_queue.c
index 857278fdd..61a2f5cef 100644
--- a/src/radeon_drm_queue.c
+++ b/src/radeon_drm_queue.c
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ radeon_drm_queue_handler(struct xorg_list *signalled,
unsigned int frame,
xorg_list_for_each_entry_safe(e, tmp, &radeon_drm_queue, list) {
if (e->seq == seq) {
if (!e->handler) {
- e->abort(e->crtc, e->data);
+ radeon_drm_queue_handle_one(e);
break;
}
--
2.19.0.rc1
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
