On 06/02/17 12:16 AM, StDenis, Tom wrote:
>
> $ pkg-config libdrm --cflags
> -I/usr/include/libdrm
>
> So we could in theory include "drm.h" and then just add that to the head
> of our CFLAGS.
Make that , but yes, that's the correct way, not just in theory. :)
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer
guez
Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2017 11:11
To: StDenis, Tom; Edward O'Callaghan; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC]: More robust build sys for UMR
Hey Tom,
It's great to see umr make it to the public. I've given it a quick spin
and it is pretty awesome, although I don&
t I've yet to see a successful IB read back.
Tom
*From:* Edward O'Callaghan
*Sent:* Sunday, February 5, 2017 08:29
*To:* StDenis, Tom; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
*Subject:* Re: [RFC]: More robust build sys for UMR
On 02/05/2017 10:42 PM, StDenis,
February 5, 2017 09:55
To: Bas Nieuwenhuizen; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC]: More robust build sys for UMR
Hi Bas,
What would be a good way to work around the paths though? Is there a pkg config
for libdrm?
Thanks,
Tom
From: amd-gfx on beh
'm not saying NAK I'm simply asking for my own edification).
Thanks,
Tom
From: Edward O'Callaghan
Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2017 23:59
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: StDenis, Tom
Subject: [RFC]: More robust build sys for UMR
Keeping with the tradition of changing
day, February 5, 2017 08:29
To: StDenis, Tom; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC]: More robust build sys for UMR
On 02/05/2017 10:42 PM, StDenis, Tom wrote:
> Hi Edward,
Hey Tom,
>
>
> Well the patches apply and work but I'm not really sure what problem
> it'
stress.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
Kind Regards,
Edward.
>
> ----------------------------
> *From:* Edward O'Callaghan
> *Sent:* Saturday, February 4, 2017 23:59
> *To:* amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> *Cc:* StDenis, Tom
>
system would fail?
>
> (I'm not saying NAK I'm simply asking for my own edification).
>
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
>
>
> *From:* Edward O'Callaghan *Sent:*
> Saturday, February 4, 2017 23:59 *To:* amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> *Cc:* StDenis,
system would fail?
(I'm not saying NAK I'm simply asking for my own edification).
Thanks,
Tom
From: Edward O'Callaghan
Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2017 23:59
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: StDenis, Tom
Subject: [RFC]: More robust build
Keeping with the tradition of changing the build system on initial
release, here we go again.. This follow series introduces the cmake
build system that is intended to be a little more robust across
various distros and presumably the BSD's also. The installation
prefix is configurable in the usual
10 matches
Mail list logo
