Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-05-19 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 18/05/17 07:22 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: > On May 18, 2017 10:17 AM, "Michel Dänzer" > wrote: > > On 17/05/17 09:35 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: > > On May 16, 2017 3:57 AM, "Michel Dänzer" >

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-05-18 Thread Marek Olšák
On May 18, 2017 10:17 AM, "Michel Dänzer" wrote: On 17/05/17 09:35 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: > On May 16, 2017 3:57 AM, "Michel Dänzer" > wrote: > On 15/05/17 07:11 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: > > On May 15, 2017 4:29 AM,

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-05-18 Thread Christian König
Am 18.05.2017 um 10:17 schrieb Michel Dänzer: [SNIP] One thing that might help would be if we could swap individual memory nodes between visible and invisible VRAM for CPU page faults, instead of moving/evicting whole BOs. Christian, do you think something like that would be possible? I've

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-05-18 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 17/05/17 09:35 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: > On May 16, 2017 3:57 AM, "Michel Dänzer" > wrote: > On 15/05/17 07:11 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: > > On May 15, 2017 4:29 AM, "Michel Dänzer" >

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-05-17 Thread Marek Olšák
On May 16, 2017 3:57 AM, "Michel Dänzer" wrote: On 15/05/17 07:11 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: > On May 15, 2017 4:29 AM, "Michel Dänzer" > wrote: > > I think the next step should be to make radeonsi keep track of how much >

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-05-14 Thread zhoucm1
On 2017年05月14日 05:31, Marek Olšák wrote: On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote: On 17/04/17 07:58 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote: On 04/04/17 05:11 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: On Fri, Mar 31,

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-05-14 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 14/05/17 06:31 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> On 17/04/17 07:58 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote: On 04/04/17 05:11 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: > On

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-05-13 Thread Marek Olšák
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On 17/04/17 07:58 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote: >>> On 04/04/17 05:11 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Michel Dänzer

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-04-17 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 17/04/17 07:58 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> On 04/04/17 05:11 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote: On 30/03/17 07:03 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-04-16 Thread Marek Olšák
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On 04/04/17 05:11 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote: >>> On 30/03/17 07:03 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote: On 25/03/17 01:33 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: >

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-04-14 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 04/04/17 05:11 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> On 30/03/17 07:03 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote: >>> On 25/03/17 01:33 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: Hi, I'm sharing this idea here, because it's something that has been

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-04-03 Thread Marek Olšák
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On 30/03/17 07:03 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> On 25/03/17 01:33 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm sharing this idea here, because it's something that has been >>> decreasing our performance a lot recently, for

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-30 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 30/03/17 07:03 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On 25/03/17 01:33 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm sharing this idea here, because it's something that has been >> decreasing our performance a lot recently, for example: >>

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-30 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 25/03/17 01:33 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: > Hi, > > I'm sharing this idea here, because it's something that has been > decreasing our performance a lot recently, for example: > http://openbenchmarking.org/prospect/1703011-RI-RADEONDIR06/7b7668cfc109d1c3dc27e871c8aea71ca13f23fa The attached

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-28 Thread Christian König
Am 28.03.2017 um 15:58 schrieb Alex Deucher: On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Christian König wrote: Am 28.03.2017 um 08:00 schrieb Michel Dänzer: On 28/03/17 12:50 PM, zhoucm1 wrote: On 2017年03月28日 10:40, Michel Dänzer wrote: On 27/03/17 04:53 PM, Zhou,

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-28 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Christian König wrote: > Am 28.03.2017 um 08:00 schrieb Michel Dänzer: >> >> On 28/03/17 12:50 PM, zhoucm1 wrote: >>> >>> On 2017年03月28日 10:40, Michel Dänzer wrote: On 27/03/17 04:53 PM, Zhou, David(ChunMing) wrote: > >

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-28 Thread Marek Olšák
On Mar 28, 2017 3:07 AM, "Michel Dänzer" wrote: On 27/03/17 07:29 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: > On Mar 27, 2017 9:35 AM, "Michel Dänzer" > wrote: > > On 25/03/17 01:33 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-28 Thread Marek Olšák
On Mar 28, 2017 10:41 AM, "Christian König" wrote: Am 28.03.2017 um 10:35 schrieb Michel Dänzer: > On 28/03/17 05:29 PM, Christian König wrote: > >> Am 28.03.2017 um 08:00 schrieb Michel Dänzer: >> >>> On 28/03/17 12:50 PM, zhoucm1 wrote: >>> On 2017年03月28日 10:40,

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-28 Thread Christian König
Am 28.03.2017 um 10:35 schrieb Michel Dänzer: On 28/03/17 05:29 PM, Christian König wrote: Am 28.03.2017 um 08:00 schrieb Michel Dänzer: On 28/03/17 12:50 PM, zhoucm1 wrote: On 2017年03月28日 10:40, Michel Dänzer wrote: On 27/03/17 04:53 PM, Zhou, David(ChunMing) wrote: For APU special case,

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-28 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 28/03/17 05:29 PM, Christian König wrote: > Am 28.03.2017 um 08:00 schrieb Michel Dänzer: >> On 28/03/17 12:50 PM, zhoucm1 wrote: >>> On 2017年03月28日 10:40, Michel Dänzer wrote: On 27/03/17 04:53 PM, Zhou, David(ChunMing) wrote: > For APU special case, can we prevent eviction happening

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-28 Thread Christian König
Am 28.03.2017 um 08:00 schrieb Michel Dänzer: On 28/03/17 12:50 PM, zhoucm1 wrote: On 2017年03月28日 10:40, Michel Dänzer wrote: On 27/03/17 04:53 PM, Zhou, David(ChunMing) wrote: For APU special case, can we prevent eviction happening between VRAM <> GTT? We can, if we can close the

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-28 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 28/03/17 12:50 PM, zhoucm1 wrote: > On 2017年03月28日 10:40, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> On 27/03/17 04:53 PM, Zhou, David(ChunMing) wrote: >>> For APU special case, can we prevent eviction happening between VRAM >>> <> GTT? >> We can, if we can close the performance gap between VRAM and GTT. We

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-27 Thread zhoucm1
r...@gmail.com> Cc: amd-gfx mailing list <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org> Subject: Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions On 25/03/17 01:33 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: Hi, I'm sharing this idea here, because it's something that has been decreasing our performance a lot recently, fo

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-27 Thread zhoucm1
On 2017年03月28日 10:40, Michel Dänzer wrote: On 27/03/17 04:53 PM, Zhou, David(ChunMing) wrote: For APU special case, can we prevent eviction happening between VRAM <> GTT? We can, if we can close the performance gap between VRAM and GTT. We measured around 30% gap a while ago, though

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-27 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 27/03/17 04:53 PM, Zhou, David(ChunMing) wrote: > For APU special case, can we prevent eviction happening between VRAM <> > GTT? We can, if we can close the performance gap between VRAM and GTT. We measured around 30% gap a while ago, though right now I'm only measuring ~5%, but the test

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-27 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 27/03/17 07:29 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: > On Mar 27, 2017 9:35 AM, "Michel Dänzer" > wrote: > > On 25/03/17 01:33 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm sharing this idea here, because it's something that has been > >

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-27 Thread Marek Olšák
On Mar 27, 2017 9:35 AM, "Michel Dänzer" wrote: On 25/03/17 01:33 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: > Hi, > > I'm sharing this idea here, because it's something that has been > decreasing our performance a lot recently, for example: >

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-27 Thread Christian König
mailing list <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org> Subject: Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions On 25/03/17 01:33 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: Hi, I'm sharing this idea here, because it's something that has been decreasing our performance a lot recently, for example: http://openb

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-27 Thread zhoucm1
Monday, March 27, 2017 3:36 PM To: Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> Cc: amd-gfx mailing list <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org> Subject: Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions On 25/03/17 01:33 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: Hi, I'm sharing this idea here, because it's somet

RE: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-27 Thread Zhou, David(ChunMing)
> Cc: amd-gfx mailing list <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org> Subject: Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions On 25/03/17 01:33 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: > Hi, > > I'm sharing this idea here, because it's something that has been > decreasing our performance a lot

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-27 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 25/03/17 01:33 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: > Hi, > > I'm sharing this idea here, because it's something that has been > decreasing our performance a lot recently, for example: > http://openbenchmarking.org/prospect/1703011-RI-RADEONDIR06/7b7668cfc109d1c3dc27e871c8aea71ca13f23fa > > I think the

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-24 Thread Samuel Pitoiset
On 03/24/2017 05:33 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: Hi, I'm sharing this idea here, because it's something that has been decreasing our performance a lot recently, for example: http://openbenchmarking.org/prospect/1703011-RI-RADEONDIR06/7b7668cfc109d1c3dc27e871c8aea71ca13f23fa I think the problem

RE: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-24 Thread Deucher, Alexander
> -Original Message- > From: amd-gfx [mailto:amd-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Marek Olšák > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 12:34 PM > To: amd-gfx mailing list > Subject: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions > > Hi, > > I'm s

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-24 Thread Marek Olšák
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Christian König wrote: > Am 24.03.2017 um 17:33 schrieb Marek Olšák: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm sharing this idea here, because it's something that has been >> decreasing our performance a lot recently, for example: >> >>

Re: Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-24 Thread Christian König
Am 24.03.2017 um 17:33 schrieb Marek Olšák: Hi, I'm sharing this idea here, because it's something that has been decreasing our performance a lot recently, for example: http://openbenchmarking.org/prospect/1703011-RI-RADEONDIR06/7b7668cfc109d1c3dc27e871c8aea71ca13f23fa I think the problem

Plan: BO move throttling for visible VRAM evictions

2017-03-24 Thread Marek Olšák
Hi, I'm sharing this idea here, because it's something that has been decreasing our performance a lot recently, for example: http://openbenchmarking.org/prospect/1703011-RI-RADEONDIR06/7b7668cfc109d1c3dc27e871c8aea71ca13f23fa I think the problem there is that Mesa git started uploading