Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/ttm: revert "implement LRU add callbacks v2"

Minor typo On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:51:10AM +0100, Christian König wrote: > From: Christian König > > The additional housekeeping had to much CPU overhead, ^ > let's use the BO priorities instead. > > Signed-off-by: Christian

Re: [PATCH 6/6] drm/ttm: revert "add optional LRU removal callback v2"

Pathces 1, 2, 5, 6: Reviewed-by: Sinclair Yeh <s...@vmware.com> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:51:11AM +0100, Christian König wrote: > From: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com> > > Without the custom LRU management the callback is not used any more. > > Sig

Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] drm: Eliminate plane->fb/crtc usage for atomic drivers

Thanks Ville. This series: Reviewed-by: Sinclair Yeh On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 09:50:32PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Here are again the last (?) bits of eliminating the plane->fb/crtc > usage for atomic drivers. I've pushed everything else (thanks to

Re: [PATCH 2/7] drm/ttm: use an operation ctx for ttm_mem_global_alloc

Hi, Sorry, I've been on a leave. Catching up on emails. In case this is still not yet merged, my comment is be consist with the new variable name. In some cases it's "ttm_opt_ctx", in others it's "ctx". I prefer ttm_opt_ctx because it's more descriptive. And yes, some description on why this