Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/ttm: use per BO cleanup workers

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 1:19 PM Christian König wrote: > > Am 13.06.23 um 16:18 schrieb Karol Herbst: > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 3:59 PM Christian König > > wrote: > >> Am 13.06.23 um 15:05 schrieb Karol Herbst: > >>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 2:40 PM Christian König > >>> wrote: > Am

Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/ttm: use per BO cleanup workers

Am 13.06.23 um 16:18 schrieb Karol Herbst: On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 3:59 PM Christian König wrote: Am 13.06.23 um 15:05 schrieb Karol Herbst: On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 2:40 PM Christian König wrote: Am 29.11.22 um 22:14 schrieb Felix Kuehling: On 2022-11-25 05:21, Christian König wrote:

Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/ttm: use per BO cleanup workers

On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 3:59 PM Christian König wrote: > > Am 13.06.23 um 15:05 schrieb Karol Herbst: > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 2:40 PM Christian König > > wrote: > >> Am 29.11.22 um 22:14 schrieb Felix Kuehling: > >>> On 2022-11-25 05:21, Christian König wrote: > Instead of a single

Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/ttm: use per BO cleanup workers

Am 13.06.23 um 15:05 schrieb Karol Herbst: On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 2:40 PM Christian König wrote: Am 29.11.22 um 22:14 schrieb Felix Kuehling: On 2022-11-25 05:21, Christian König wrote: Instead of a single worker going over the list of delete BOs in regular intervals use a per BO worker

Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/ttm: use per BO cleanup workers

On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 2:40 PM Christian König wrote: > > Am 29.11.22 um 22:14 schrieb Felix Kuehling: > > On 2022-11-25 05:21, Christian König wrote: > >> Instead of a single worker going over the list of delete BOs in regular > >> intervals use a per BO worker which blocks for the resv object

Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/ttm: use per BO cleanup workers

Am 29.11.22 um 22:14 schrieb Felix Kuehling: On 2022-11-25 05:21, Christian König wrote: Instead of a single worker going over the list of delete BOs in regular intervals use a per BO worker which blocks for the resv object and locking of the BO. This not only simplifies the handling

Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/ttm: use per BO cleanup workers

On 2022-11-25 05:21, Christian König wrote: Instead of a single worker going over the list of delete BOs in regular intervals use a per BO worker which blocks for the resv object and locking of the BO. This not only simplifies the handling massively, but also results in much better response

[PATCH 3/9] drm/ttm: use per BO cleanup workers

Instead of a single worker going over the list of delete BOs in regular intervals use a per BO worker which blocks for the resv object and locking of the BO. This not only simplifies the handling massively, but also results in much better response time when cleaning up buffers. Signed-off-by: