On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:56 AM, Christian König
wrote:
> Hi Rex,
>
> So amd_vce_state is our hardware representation and
> drm_amdgpu_info_vce_clock_table is the IOCTL interface structure? Is there a
> reason for not using drm_amdgpu_info_vce_clock_table directly in the hw
> manager, except that
r; Zhang, Boyuan
*Cc:* Deucher, Alexander
*Subject:* Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/amdgpu/powerplay: add an implementation
for get_vce_clock_table
Hi Rex,
the problem with this approach is that you need to copy the entries
from one structure to another, like we have below:
> + vce_
ober 12, 2016 4:53 PM
To: Zhu, Rex; Alex Deucher; amd-gfx list; Fang, Peter; Zhang, Boyuan
Cc: Deucher, Alexander
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/amdgpu/powerplay: add an implementation for
get_vce_clock_table
Hi Rex,
the problem with this approach is that you need to copy the entries from one
er. We can notify UMD by add a member in struct drm_amdgpu_info_vce_clock_table.
Best Regards
Rex
-Original Message-
From: Alex Deucher [mailto:alexdeuc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 4:07 AM
To: amd-gfx list; Fang, Peter; Zhang, Boyuan; Zhu, Rex
Cc: Deucher, Alexande
fy UMD by add a member in struct
drm_amdgpu_info_vce_clock_table.
Best Regards
Rex
-Original Message-
From: Alex Deucher [mailto:alexdeuc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 4:07 AM
To: amd-gfx list; Fang, Peter; Zhang, Boyuan; Zhu, Rex
Cc: Deucher, Alexander
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5
Rex what is your opinion on exposing the amdgpu drm structure through
to powerplay? We could do an intermediate interface, but that just
seems like extra hoops to jump through for pretty questionable gain.
Alex
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> Used by the powerplay dpm code
