Re: [V2 0/6] drm/amdgpu: add support SR-IOV initialization
I'm not so deeply into those parts, but that seem to make sense. So whole set is Acked-by: Christian König . Regards, Christian. Am 02.12.2016 um 07:03 schrieb Xiangliang Yu: As SR-IOV initialization is difference from bare metal, the series patch will change code path of initialization according to HW design. Changes in V2: 1. Remove VM fault patch; 2. Split out the third patch into two patches to make more clear; Xiangliang Yu (6): drm/amdgpu: drop redundant vi_mqd define drm/amd/powerplay: cut digest part drm/amd/powerplay: Ignore smu buffer usage drm/amd/powerplay: Adjust the position of data size initial drm/amdgpu: Don't touch GFX hw during HW fini drm/amd/powerplay: Fix potential NULL pointer issue drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c | 270 + drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amd_powerplay.c | 4 +- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/smu7_smumgr.c | 19 +- 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 268 deletions(-) ___ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
RE: [V2 0/6] drm/amdgpu: add support SR-IOV initialization
> -Original Message- > From: Alex Deucher [mailto:alexdeuc...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 2:16 PM > To: Yu, Xiangliang > Cc: amd-gfx list > Subject: Re: [V2 0/6] drm/amdgpu: add support SR-IOV initialization > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Xiangliang Yu > wrote: > > As SR-IOV initialization is difference from bare metal, the series > > patch will change code path of initialization according to HW design. > > > > Changes in V2: > > 1. Remove VM fault patch; > > 2. Split out the third patch into two patches to make more clear; > > > > Xiangliang Yu (6): > > drm/amdgpu: drop redundant vi_mqd define > > drm/amd/powerplay: cut digest part > > drm/amd/powerplay: Ignore smu buffer usage > > drm/amd/powerplay: Adjust the position of data size initial > > drm/amdgpu: Don't touch GFX hw during HW fini > > drm/amd/powerplay: Fix potential NULL pointer issue > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c | 270 > > + > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amd_powerplay.c | 4 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/smu7_smumgr.c | 19 +- > > 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 268 deletions(-) > > Patches 1-5 are: > Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher > > I didn't see patch 6, but presumably it's the same NULL pointer fix you send > out previously. Yes, exactly same patch ___ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
Re: [V2 0/6] drm/amdgpu: add support SR-IOV initialization
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Xiangliang Yu wrote: > As SR-IOV initialization is difference from bare metal, the series patch > will change code path of initialization according to HW design. > > Changes in V2: > 1. Remove VM fault patch; > 2. Split out the third patch into two patches to make more clear; > > Xiangliang Yu (6): > drm/amdgpu: drop redundant vi_mqd define > drm/amd/powerplay: cut digest part > drm/amd/powerplay: Ignore smu buffer usage > drm/amd/powerplay: Adjust the position of data size initial > drm/amdgpu: Don't touch GFX hw during HW fini > drm/amd/powerplay: Fix potential NULL pointer issue > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c | 270 > + > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amd_powerplay.c | 4 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/smu7_smumgr.c | 19 +- > 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 268 deletions(-) Patches 1-5 are: Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher I didn't see patch 6, but presumably it's the same NULL pointer fix you send out previously. Alex ___ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx